Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 18;13(1):22535. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49911-7.
Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) present a public health issue and are one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions causing chronic pain. This study compares the outcomes of occlusal splint therapy in patients with TMD following two different maxillomandibular relationship (MMR) registration techniques. 40 TMD patients were randomly allocated to MMR registration with the Aqualizer system (AQU) or with chin point guidance (CPG) prior to fabricating occlusal splints. TMD symptoms, subjective pain intensity, and quality of life (QoL) were recorded at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. The treatment led to an overall reduction of TMD symptoms in both groups (Conover test, p < 0.00001). TMJ sounds, TMJ pain with palpation and muscle pain with palpation subsided regardless of the type of MMR registration method used (Cohen's d > 0.8). AQU-based occlusal splints led to a better improvement of TMJ pain with maximum opening compared to CPG-based occlusal splints (Cohen's d = 0.9; CPG d = 0.13). In both groups, occlusal splint treatment had little to no effect on correcting lateral mandible deviation or improving restricted jaw opening. After 6 months occlusal splints in both groups had a large effect on improving subjective pain intensity (Cohen's d > 0.8), however, patients reported a higher QoL in the AQU group compared to the CPG group (Mann-Whitney-U-test, p < 0.05). The results of this study support the premise that occlusal splints are effective in relieving pain-related TMD symptoms. The Aqualizer can be considered for determining MMR in cases, where guided registration techniques are not possible.Trial registration: DRKS00031998.
颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)是一个公共健康问题,也是最常见的引起慢性疼痛的肌肉骨骼疾病之一。本研究比较了两种不同的颌位关系(MMR)记录技术在 TMD 患者中应用咬合板治疗的结果。40 名 TMD 患者随机分为使用 Aqualizer 系统(AQU)或颏点引导(CPG)进行 MMR 记录,然后制作咬合板。在基线时、治疗后 3 个月和 6 个月记录 TMD 症状、主观疼痛强度和生活质量(QoL)。治疗后两组 TMD 症状均有总体减轻(Conover 检验,p<0.00001)。无论使用哪种 MMR 记录方法,TMJ 弹响、TMJ 压痛和肌肉压痛均减轻(Cohen's d>0.8)。与 CPG 基咬合板相比,AQU 基咬合板治疗后最大开口时 TMJ 疼痛改善更好(Cohen's d=0.9;CPG d=0.13)。两组中,咬合板治疗对纠正下颌侧方偏斜或改善张口受限几乎没有影响。治疗 6 个月后,两组的咬合板治疗对改善主观疼痛强度均有较大影响(Cohen's d>0.8),但 AQU 组患者的 QoL 高于 CPG 组(Mann-Whitney-U 检验,p<0.05)。本研究结果支持咬合板治疗能缓解与疼痛相关的 TMD 症状的前提。在无法进行引导注册技术的情况下,可考虑使用 Aqualizer 来确定 MMR。试验注册:DRKS00031998。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020-1-22
Sci Rep. 2025-4-28
Med Sci Monit. 2025-4-21