Suppr超能文献

接受化学免疫疗法或伊布替尼治疗的慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者血液免疫库与临床特征的比较。

Comparison of the blood immune repertoire with clinical features in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy or ibrutinib.

作者信息

Welch Baustin M, Manso Bryce A, Gwin Kimberly A, Lothert Petra K, Parikh Sameer A, Kay Neil E, Medina Kay L

机构信息

Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 4;13:1302038. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1302038. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by the accumulation of CD19 CD5 clonal B lymphocytes in the blood, bone marrow, and peripheral lymphoid organs. Treatment options for patients range from historical chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) to small molecule inhibitors targeting pro-survival pathways in leukemic B cells, such as the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib (IBR). Using biobanked blood samples obtained pre-therapy and at standard response evaluation timepoints, we performed an in-depth evaluation of the blood innate and adaptive immune compartments between pentostatin-based CIT and IBR and looked for correlations with clinical sequelae. CD4 conventional T cells and CD8 cytotoxic T cells responded similarly to CIT and IBR, although exhaustion status differed. Both treatments dramatically increased the prevalence and functional status of monocyte, dendritic cell, and natural killer cell subsets. As expected, both regimens reduced clonal B cell levels however, we observed no substantial recovery of normal B cells. Although improvements in most immune subsets were observed with CIT and IBR at response evaluation, both patient groups remained susceptible to infections and secondary malignancies during the study.

摘要

慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的特征是血液、骨髓和外周淋巴器官中CD19+CD5+克隆性B淋巴细胞的积聚。患者的治疗选择范围从传统的化疗免疫疗法(CIT)到靶向白血病B细胞中促生存途径的小分子抑制剂,如布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂伊布替尼(IBR)。我们使用治疗前和标准反应评估时间点采集的生物样本库中的血液样本,对基于喷司他丁的CIT和IBR治疗之间血液中的固有免疫和适应性免疫区室进行了深入评估,并寻找与临床后遗症的相关性。CD4+常规T细胞和CD8+细胞毒性T细胞对CIT和IBR的反应相似,尽管耗竭状态有所不同。两种治疗均显著增加了单核细胞、树突状细胞和自然杀伤细胞亚群的患病率和功能状态。正如预期的那样,两种治疗方案均降低了克隆性B细胞水平,然而,我们未观察到正常B细胞的实质性恢复。尽管在反应评估时,CIT和IBR治疗均观察到大多数免疫亚群有所改善,但在研究期间,两组患者仍易发生感染和继发性恶性肿瘤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c2/10725910/7df256ecca3b/fonc-13-1302038-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验