Suppr超能文献

淋巴结细针穿刺细胞学检查的陷阱。

Pitfalls in Lymph Node Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 2024;68(3):260-280. doi: 10.1159/000535906. Epub 2023 Dec 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is an accurate, minimally invasive, and cost-effective biopsy method for enlarged lymph nodes. While the role of lymph node FNAC in the diagnosis of infectious or reactive conditions and metastatic malignancy is unquestioned, differing views still exist on its role in the diagnosis of lymphoma. Nevertheless, regardless of the practice setting, pitfalls and potential for error exist, and it is incumbent upon the pathologist to be aware of these pitfalls, as this is the first line of defence against errors.

SUMMARY

This discussion will focus on potential interpretational errors, specifically highlighting scenarios leading to false-negative and false-positive diagnosis and errors in tumour classification, with an emphasis on cytomorphology. Potential entities that may fly below the radar of the pathologist - so-called off-radar entities - are also discussed, as a reminder to consider broad differentials in cases with unusual morphologic features. Some reasons for false-negative diagnoses include low-grade lymphomas that mimic a mixed, polymorphous reactive lymphoid population or aspirates with a paucity of lesional cells, through either sampling error or the intrinsic nature of the entity, e.g., nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma. Some of the potential causes of false-positive diagnoses that are discussed include viral-associated lymphadenopathy, Kikuchi-Fujimoto lymphadenitis, or benign adnexal lesions mimicking metastatic malignancy. Errors in tumour classification covered include metastatic carcinoma, sarcoma, melanoma, and lymphoma mimicking each other, and Hodgkin lymphoma and its mimics. Finally, less common entities such as follicular dendritic cell sarcoma and others are briefly mentioned, to remind us of conditions that may slip under our diagnostic radar.

KEY MESSAGES

A systematic review of diagnostic pitfalls and traps is elucidated here, with some tips to avoid these traps. The triple approach to the diagnostic workup is emphasised, which includes rigorous clinicopathologic correlation, attention to cytomorphology, and judicious application of ancillary tests.

摘要

背景

细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)是一种准确、微创且具有成本效益的用于诊断淋巴结肿大的活检方法。尽管淋巴结 FNAC 在诊断感染或反应性疾病以及转移性恶性肿瘤方面的作用毋庸置疑,但对于其在诊断淋巴瘤方面的作用仍存在不同观点。然而,无论在何种实践环境下,都存在着陷阱和潜在的错误,病理学家有责任意识到这些陷阱,因为这是防止错误的第一道防线。

摘要

本讨论将重点关注潜在的解释性错误,特别是强调导致假阴性和假阳性诊断以及肿瘤分类错误的情况,重点关注细胞形态学。还讨论了可能被病理学家忽视的潜在实体,即所谓的“雷达下实体”,以提醒在具有不寻常形态特征的病例中考虑广泛的鉴别诊断。假阴性诊断的一些原因包括低级别淋巴瘤,其类似于混合、多形性反应性淋巴样群体,或由于采样误差或实体的固有性质(例如结节性淋巴细胞为主型霍奇金淋巴瘤)而导致病变细胞稀少的抽吸物。讨论的一些潜在假阳性诊断的原因包括病毒相关性淋巴结病、Kikuchi-Fujimoto 淋巴结炎或良性附属病变模拟转移性恶性肿瘤。涵盖的肿瘤分类错误包括转移性癌、肉瘤、黑色素瘤和相互模拟的淋巴瘤,以及霍奇金淋巴瘤及其模拟物。最后,简要提到了一些罕见实体,如滤泡树突状细胞肉瘤等,以提醒我们注意可能滑过我们诊断雷达的情况。

关键信息

本文阐述了诊断陷阱和误区的系统综述,并提供了一些避免这些误区的技巧。强调了诊断工作流程的三重方法,包括严格的临床病理相关性、对细胞形态学的关注以及辅助检查的合理应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5e/11305520/45bc8f29d41f/acy-2024-0068-0003-535906_F01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验