Instituto Brasileiro de Controle do Câncer , São Paulo , SP , Brazil .
Centro Universitário FMABC , Santo André , SP , Brazil .
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2023 Dec 22;21:eAO0481. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AO0481. eCollection 2023.
To evaluate whether intrathecal chemotherapy improves clinical outcomes in patients with meningeal carcinomatosis.
This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with breast cancer diagnosed with meningeal carcinomatosis. Clinical and treatment data were collected from the patients' medical charts. The primary outcome was overall survival, and the secondary outcomes were time to neurological deterioration and reporting of clinical benefit. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential confounders were used to evaluate the clinical response and overall survival, respectively.
Overall, 109 female patients were included, 50 (45.9%) of whom received intrathecal chemotherapy with methotrexate and dexamethasone. The median treatment duration was 3 weeks (range, 1-13 weeks). Patients treated with intrathecal chemotherapy were more likely to report clinical benefit (74% versus 57.7%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 9.0, 95%CI=2.6-30.9, p<0.001). However, there was no difference in the time to neurologic deterioration (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96, 95%CI= 0.57-1.59, p=0.86). Patients who received intrathecal chemotherapy did not show an increase in overall survival compared with that of patients who did not receive intrathecal chemotherapy (median overall survival = 1.8 months, 95%CI= 1.27-3.0 versus 2.5, 95%CI= 1.9-3.9, adjusted HR = 0.71, 95%CI= 0.41-1.22, p=0.21). There was a significant interaction between intrathecal chemotherapy and systemic treatment, and patients who received systemic therapy without intrathecal chemotherapy had better overall survival than that of the no-treatment group (adjusted HR = 0.38, 95%CI= 0.20-0.70, p=0.002).
Intrathecal chemotherapy did not increase overall survival or time to neurological deterioration and should not preclude or postpone systemic treatments.
评估鞘内化疗是否能改善脑膜癌病患者的临床结局。
本回顾性队列研究纳入了连续确诊为脑膜癌病的乳腺癌患者。从患者病历中收集临床和治疗数据。主要结局为总生存期,次要结局为神经功能恶化时间和临床获益报告。使用逻辑回归和 Cox 比例风险模型分别调整潜在混杂因素来评估临床反应和总生存期。
共纳入 109 名女性患者,其中 50 名(45.9%)接受了甲氨蝶呤和地塞米松的鞘内化疗。中位治疗持续时间为 3 周(范围:1-13 周)。接受鞘内化疗的患者更有可能报告临床获益(74%比 57.7%,调整后的优势比[OR] = 9.0,95%CI=2.6-30.9,p<0.001)。然而,神经功能恶化时间无差异(风险比[HR] = 0.96,95%CI= 0.57-1.59,p=0.86)。与未接受鞘内化疗的患者相比,接受鞘内化疗的患者总生存期无增加(中位总生存期=1.8 个月,95%CI=1.27-3.0 与 2.5 个月,95%CI=1.9-3.9,调整后的 HR=0.71,95%CI=0.41-1.22,p=0.21)。鞘内化疗与全身治疗之间存在显著交互作用,接受全身治疗而未接受鞘内化疗的患者总生存期优于未治疗组(调整后的 HR = 0.38,95%CI= 0.20-0.70,p=0.002)。
鞘内化疗并未增加总生存期或神经功能恶化时间,不应排除或推迟全身治疗。