Suppr超能文献

动作不会在工具周围空间中产生视觉偏差。

Action does not drive visual biases in peri-tool space.

机构信息

Center for Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Feb;86(2):525-535. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02826-x. Epub 2023 Dec 20.

Abstract

Observers experience visual biases in the area around handheld tools. These biases may occur when active use leads an observer to incorporate a tool into the body schema. However, the visual salience of a handheld tool may instead create an attentional prioritization that is not reliant on body-based representations. We investigated these competing explanations of near-tool visual biases in two experiments during which participants performed a target detection task. Targets could appear near or far from a tool positioned next to a display. In Experiment 1, participants showed facilitation in detecting targets that appeared near a simple handheld rake tool regardless of whether they first used the rake to retrieve objects, but participants who only viewed the tool without holding it were no faster to detect targets appearing near the rake than targets that appeared on the opposite side of the display. In a second experiment, participants who held a novel magnetic tool again showed a near-tool bias even when they refrained from using the tool. Taken together, these results suggest active use is unnecessary, but visual salience is not sufficient, to introduce visual biases in peri-tool space.

摘要

观察者在手持工具周围会体验到视觉偏差。这些偏差可能是由于主动使用导致观察者将工具纳入身体图式而引起的。然而,手持工具的视觉显著性可能会产生一种不依赖于基于身体的表示的注意力优先级。在两项实验中,我们研究了这些关于近工具视觉偏差的竞争解释,参与者在实验中执行了目标检测任务。目标可以出现在靠近或远离显示器旁边放置的工具的位置。在实验 1 中,无论参与者是否首先使用耙子来取回物体,参与者在检测出现在简单手持耙子附近的目标时都表现出促进作用,但仅观察工具而不握持工具的参与者在检测出现在耙子附近的目标时并没有比出现在显示器另一侧的目标更快。在第二项实验中,即使参与者避免使用新的磁性工具,他们再次表现出了近工具的偏差。总的来说,这些结果表明,主动使用不是必要的,但视觉显著性不足以在工具周围引入视觉偏差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验