McCulloch Robert A, Martin Alex, Young Bernadette C, Kendrick Benjamin J, Alvand Abtin, Jeys Lee, Stevenson Jonathan, Palmer Antony J
The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 4LP, UK.
The Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7HE, UK.
J Bone Jt Infect. 2023 Nov 3;8(6):229-234. doi: 10.5194/jbji-8-229-2023. eCollection 2023.
A proportion of patients with hip and knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI) undergo multiple revisions with the aim of eradicating infection and improving quality of life. The aim of this study was to describe the microbiology cultured from multiply revised hip and knee replacement procedures to guide antimicrobial therapy at the time of surgery. : Consecutive patients were retrospectively identified from databases at two specialist orthopaedic centres in the United Kingdom between 2011 and 2019. Patient were included who had undergone repeat-revision total knee replacement (TKR) or total hip replacement (THR) for infection, following an initial failed revision for infection. : A total of 106 patients were identified. Of these patients, 74 underwent revision TKR and 32 underwent revision THR. The mean age at first revision was 67 years (SD 10). The Charlson comorbidity index was 2 for 31 patients, 3-4 for 57 patients, and 5 for 18 patients. All patients underwent at least two revisions, 73 patients received three, 47 patients received four, 31 patients received five, and 21 patients received at least six. After six revisions, 90 % of patients had different organisms cultured compared with the initial revision, and 53 % of organisms were multidrug resistant. The most frequent organisms at each revision were coagulase-negative (36 %) and (19 %). Fungus was cultured from 3 % of revisions, and 21 % of infections were polymicrobial. : Patients undergoing multiple revisions for PJI are highly likely to experience a change in organism, with 90 % of patients having a different organism cultured by their sixth revision. It is therefore important to administer empirical antibiotics at each subsequent revision, taking into account known drug resistance from previous cultures. Our results do not support the routine use of empirical antifungals.
一部分髋膝关节假体关节感染(PJI)患者会接受多次翻修手术,目的是根除感染并提高生活质量。本研究的目的是描述多次翻修的髋膝关节置换手术中培养出的微生物情况,以指导手术时的抗菌治疗。方法:对2011年至2019年间英国两个专科骨科中心数据库中的连续患者进行回顾性识别。纳入的患者为因感染初次翻修失败后,再次接受全膝关节置换(TKR)或全髋关节置换(THR)翻修手术的患者。结果:共识别出106例患者。其中,74例接受了TKR翻修,32例接受了THR翻修。首次翻修时的平均年龄为67岁(标准差10)。31例患者的Charlson合并症指数为2,57例患者为3 - 4,18例患者为5。所有患者至少接受了两次翻修,73例患者接受了三次翻修,47例患者接受了四次翻修,31例患者接受了五次翻修,21例患者接受了至少六次翻修。六次翻修后,90%的患者培养出的微生物与初次翻修时不同,53%的微生物具有多重耐药性。每次翻修时最常见的微生物是凝固酶阴性菌(36%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(19%)。3%的翻修培养出了真菌,21%的感染为多微生物感染。结论:因PJI接受多次翻修的患者很可能经历微生物的变化,90%的患者在第六次翻修时培养出不同的微生物。因此,在每次后续翻修时给予经验性抗生素很重要,要考虑到先前培养已知的耐药情况。我们的结果不支持常规使用经验性抗真菌药物。