Department of Optometry and Vision Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Department of Optometry and Vision Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
J Optom. 2024 Jul-Sep;17(3):100506. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2023.100506. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
To investigate the visual function correlates of self-reported vision-related night driving difficulties among drivers.
One hundred and seven drivers (age: 46.06 ± 8.24, visual acuity [VA] of 0.2logMAR or better) were included in the study. A standard vision and night driving questionnaire (VND-Q) was administered. VA and contrast sensitivity were measured under photopic and mesopic conditions. Mesopic VA was remeasured after introducing a peripheral glare source into the participants' field of view to enable computation of disability glare index. Regression analyses were used to assess the associations between VND-Q scores, and visual function measures.
The mean VND-Q score was -3.96±1.95 logit (interval scale score: 2.46±1.28). Simple linear regression models for photopic contrast sensitivity, mesopic VA, mesopic contrast sensitivity, and disability index significantly predicted VND-Q score (P<0.05), with mesopic VA and disability glare index accounting for the greatest variation (21 %) in VND-Q scores followed by photopic contrast sensitivity (19 %), and mesopic contrast sensitivity (15 %). A multiple regression model to determine the association between the predictors (photopic contrast sensitivity, mesopic VA, mesopic contrast sensitivity, and disability index) and VND-Q score yielded significant results, F (4, 102) = 8.58, P < 0.001, adj. R = 0.2224. Seeing dark-colored cars was the most challenging vision task.
Changes in mesopic visual acuity, photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity, as well as disability glare index are associated with and explain night driving-related visual difficulties. It is recommended to incorporate measurement of these visual functions into assessments related to driving performance.
研究驾驶员自我报告的夜间视力相关困难与视觉功能的相关性。
本研究纳入了 107 名驾驶员(年龄:46.06±8.24,视力[VA]≥0.2logMAR)。他们接受了标准视力和夜间驾驶问卷(VND-Q)调查。在明适应和中间适应条件下测量 VA 和对比敏感度。在参与者的视野中引入周边眩光源后,重新测量中间适应 VA,以计算眩光障碍指数。回归分析用于评估 VND-Q 评分与视觉功能测量值之间的相关性。
平均 VND-Q 得分为-3.96±1.95 对数(区间量表评分:2.46±1.28)。明适应对比敏感度、中间适应 VA、中间适应对比敏感度和障碍指数的简单线性回归模型均显著预测 VND-Q 评分(P<0.05),其中中间适应 VA 和眩光障碍指数对 VND-Q 评分的变异解释最大(21%),其次是明适应对比敏感度(19%)和中间适应对比敏感度(15%)。用于确定预测因子(明适应对比敏感度、中间适应 VA、中间适应对比敏感度和障碍指数)与 VND-Q 评分之间关联的多元回归模型得出了显著结果,F(4,102)=8.58,P<0.001,调整 R=0.2224。看到深色汽车是最具挑战性的视觉任务。
中间适应视力、明适应和中间适应对比敏感度以及眩光障碍指数的变化与夜间驾驶相关的视觉困难相关,并解释了这些视觉困难。建议将这些视觉功能的测量纳入与驾驶表现相关的评估中。