Suppr超能文献

利用风险分层路径实现肝切除术后出院计划的个体化:对 1354 例患者的当代分析。

Utilizing risk-stratified pathways to personalize post-hepatectomy discharge planning: A contemporary analysis of 1,354 patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2024 Jul;233:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.12.013. Epub 2023 Dec 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While risk-stratified post-hepatectomy pathways (RSPHPs) reduce length-of-stay, can they stratify hepatectomy patients by risk of early postoperative events.

METHODS

90-day outcomes from consecutive hepatectomies were analyzed (1/1/2017-12/31/2021). Pre/post-pathway analysis was performed for pathways: minimally invasive surgery ("MIS"); non-anatomic resection/left hepatectomy ("low-intermediate risk"); right/extended hepatectomy ("high-risk"); "Combination" operations. Time-to-event (TTE) analyses for readmission and interventional radiology procedures (IRPs) was performed.

RESULTS

1354 patients were included: MIS/n= ​119 (9 ​%); low-intermediate risk/n= ​443 (33 ​%); high-risk/n= ​328 (24 ​%); Combination/n= ​464 (34 ​%). There was no difference in readmission (pre: 13 ​% vs. post:11.5 ​%, p ​= ​0.398). There were fewer readmissions in post-pathway patients amongst MIS, low-intermediate risk, and Combination patients (all p ​> ​0.1). 114 (8.4 ​%) patients required IRPs. Time-to-readmission and time-to-IR-procedure plots demonstrated lower plateaus and flatter slopes for MIS/low-intermediate-risk pathways post-pathway implementation (p ​< ​0.001).

CONCLUSION

RSPHPs can reliably stratify patients by risks of readmission or need for an IR procedure by predicting the most frequent period for these events.

摘要

背景

虽然风险分层的肝切除术后途径(RSPHPs)可以减少住院时间,但它们能否根据术后早期事件的风险对肝切除术患者进行分层。

方法

分析了连续肝切除术的 90 天结果(2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日)。对以下途径进行了术前/术后途径分析:微创外科(“MIS”);非解剖性切除/左肝切除术(“低-中危”);右/扩大肝切除术(“高危”);“联合”手术。对再入院和介入放射学程序(IRP)进行了时间到事件(TTE)分析。

结果

共纳入 1354 例患者:MIS/n=119(9%);低-中危/n=443(33%);高危/n=328(24%);联合/n=464(34%)。再入院率无差异(术前:13%vs.术后:11.5%,p=0.398)。MIS、低-中危和联合患者术后再入院率较低(均 p>0.1)。114(8.4%)例患者需要 IRP。再入院时间和 IR 程序时间图显示,术后实施 RSPHPs 后,MIS/低-中危途径的再入院率和 IR 程序需求的平台较低且斜率较平坦(p<0.001)。

结论

RSPHPs 可以通过预测这些事件最常见的时期,可靠地对再入院或需要 IR 程序的风险进行分层。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验