Hastings Cent Rep. 2023 Nov;53(6):35-37. doi: 10.1002/hast.1542.
Mass incarceration is an ethical crisis. Yet it is not only the magnitude of the system that is troubling. Mass incarceration has been created and sustained by racism, classism, and ableism, and the problems of the criminal legal system will not be solved without meaningfully intervening upon these forms of oppression. Beyond that, incarceration itself-whether of one person or 2 million-represents a moral failing. To punish and control, rather than invest in community and healing, is antithetical to the values of the field of bioethics. This commentary, which responds to the article "Fifty Years of U.S. Mass Incarceration and What It Means for Bioethics," by Sean Valles, considers abolition as a crucial form of justice that must be centered in the work of bioethics. Abolition is both an antiracist intervention and a means of considering the ways health care broadly and bioethics specifically have allowed for the perpetuation of carcerality in the United States.
大规模监禁是一场道德危机。然而,令人困扰的不仅是这一制度的规模。大规模监禁是由种族主义、阶级主义和能力主义造成的,并得以维持,而如果不在这些形式的压迫上进行有意义的干预,刑事法律制度的问题将无法得到解决。除此之外,监禁本身——无论是监禁一个人还是 200 万人——都代表着一种道德上的失败。惩罚和控制,而不是投资于社区和治疗,与生物伦理学领域的价值观背道而驰。这篇评论是对 Sean Valles 题为“美国大规模监禁 50 年及其对生物伦理学的意义”一文的回应,它认为废除死刑是一种至关重要的正义形式,必须成为生物伦理学工作的核心。废除死刑既是一种反种族主义干预,也是一种考虑更广泛的医疗保健和具体的生物伦理学如何允许在美国继续存在监禁的方式。