Department of Psychiatry, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Mental Disorder Management in Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China; Brain Research Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Zhejiang Engineering Center for Mathematical Mental Health, Hangzhou, China.
Centre for Cognition and Brain Disorders, Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China; TMS Centre, Deqing Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Biol Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 1;96(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.12.013. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
BACKGROUND: Suicidal ideation is a substantial clinical challenge in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Recent work demonstrated promising antidepressant effects in TRD patients with no or mild suicidal ideation using a specific protocol termed intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). Here, we examined the clinical effects of accelerated schedules of iTBS and continuous TBS (cTBS) in patients with moderate to severe suicidal ideation. METHODS: Patients with TRD and moderate to severe suicidal ideation (n = 44) were randomly assigned to receive accelerated iTBS or cTBS treatment. Treatments were delivered in 10 daily TBS sessions (1800 pulses/session) for 5 consecutive days (total of 90,000 pulses). Neuronavigation was employed to target accelerated iTBS and cTBS to the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), respectively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in a 4-week follow-up period. RESULTS: Accelerated cTBS was superior to iTBS in the management of suicidal ideation (p = .027) and anxiety symptoms (p = .01). Accelerated iTBS and cTBS were comparable in antidepressant effects (p < .001; accelerated cTBS: mean change at weeks 1, 3, 5 = 49.55%, 54.99%, 53.11%; accelerated iTBS: mean change at weeks 1, 3, 5 = 44.52%, 48.04%, 51.74%). No serious adverse events occurred during the trial. One patient withdrew due to hypomania. The most common adverse event was discomfort at the treatment site (22.73% in both groups). CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide the first evidence that accelerated schedules of left DLPFC iTBS and right DLPFC cTBS are comparably effective in managing antidepressant symptoms and indicate that right DLPFC cTBS is potentially superior in reducing suicidal ideation and anxiety symptoms.
背景:自杀意念是治疗抵抗性抑郁症(TRD)的一个重大临床挑战。最近的研究表明,对于自杀意念较轻或无自杀意念的 TRD 患者,采用一种称为间歇性 theta 爆发刺激(iTBS)的特定方案具有有前途的抗抑郁作用。在这里,我们检查了中度至重度自杀意念患者使用加速 iTBS 和连续 TBS(cTBS)的临床效果。
方法:将 44 名 TRD 伴中度至重度自杀意念的患者随机分配接受加速 iTBS 或 cTBS 治疗。治疗在 10 天的 TBS 疗程中进行(每个疗程 1800 个脉冲),连续 5 天(共 90,000 个脉冲)。采用神经导航分别将加速 iTBS 和 cTBS 靶向左侧和右侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)。在 4 周的随访期间评估临床结果。
结果:加速 cTBS 在管理自杀意念(p=0.027)和焦虑症状(p=0.01)方面优于 iTBS。加速 iTBS 和 cTBS 在抗抑郁作用方面相当(p<0.001;加速 cTBS:第 1、3、5 周的平均变化=49.55%、54.99%、53.11%;加速 iTBS:第 1、3、5 周的平均变化=44.52%、48.04%、51.74%)。试验过程中未发生严重不良事件。1 例患者因轻躁狂而退出。最常见的不良事件是治疗部位不适(两组均为 22.73%)。
结论:这些发现首次提供了证据表明,左侧 DLPFC iTBS 和右侧 DLPFC cTBS 的加速方案在管理抗抑郁症状方面同样有效,并表明右侧 DLPFC cTBS 可能在降低自杀意念和焦虑症状方面更具优势。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2016-4-3