Autoimmune Diseases Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2023 Dec 26;44(4):385-391. doi: 10.1515/hmbci-2022-0070. eCollection 2023 Dec 1.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of pioglitazone and linagliptin on glycemic control, lipid profile and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin. METHODS: The present randomized clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin in the age range of 30-60 years. The participants with informed consent were randomly assigned to receive pioglitazone or linagliptin. The first intervention group (n=30) received 30 mg of pioglitazone daily and the second intervention group (n=30) received 5 mg of linagliptin daily for 12 weeks. Fasting blood samples were taken from patients at the baseline and after 12 weeks to measure related variables. The current study was approved in Kashan University of Medical Sciences (with the code of ethics of IR.KAUMS.MEDNT.REC.1398.016), and the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (with the registration number of IRCT20170513033941N66). RESULTS: The linagliptin administration significantly reduced serum levels of fasting blood sugar (p=0.03), blood sugar 2 h after a meal (p=0.02), glycosylated hemoglobin (p=0.02) and hs-CRP (p=0.005) after 12 weeks compared with pioglitazone. In contrast, the pioglitazone administration significantly decreased triglyceride levels (p=0.01) and increased HDL-cholesterol (p=0.002) compared to linagliptin. In addition, the administration of both linagliptin and pioglitazone drugs had no significant effect on LDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, creatinine and blood urea. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated the superiority of linagliptin over pioglitazone for glycemic control, although pioglitazone compared to linagliptin showed greater efficacy in reducing triglycerides and raising HDL-cholesterol.
目的:本研究旨在比较吡格列酮和利拉利汀对二甲双胍治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制、血脂谱和高敏 C 反应蛋白(hs-CRP)参数的影响。
方法:本随机临床试验纳入了年龄在 30-60 岁之间、接受二甲双胍治疗的 60 例 2 型糖尿病患者。征得知情同意的参与者被随机分配接受吡格列酮或利拉利汀治疗。第一干预组(n=30)每天接受 30mg 吡格列酮,第二干预组(n=30)每天接受 5mg 利拉利汀,治疗 12 周。在基线和 12 周后从患者采集空腹血样,以测量相关变量。本研究得到了 Kashan 医科大学(伦理代码为 IR.KAUMS.MEDNT.REC.1398.016)和伊朗临床试验注册中心(注册号为 IRCT20170513033941N66)的批准。
结果:与吡格列酮相比,利拉利汀治疗 12 周后可显著降低空腹血糖(p=0.03)、餐后 2 小时血糖(p=0.02)、糖化血红蛋白(p=0.02)和 hs-CRP(p=0.005)水平。相反,与利拉利汀相比,吡格列酮治疗可显著降低三酰甘油水平(p=0.01)并升高高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(p=0.002)。此外,利拉利汀和吡格列酮治疗对 LDL-胆固醇、总胆固醇、收缩压和舒张压、肌酐和血尿素无显著影响。
结论:本研究表明,利拉利汀在血糖控制方面优于吡格列酮,尽管吡格列酮在降低三酰甘油和升高 HDL-胆固醇方面比利拉利汀更有效。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2019-5-26