Suppr超能文献

RSClin 风险计算器在国家癌症数据库中的验证。

Validation of the RSClin risk calculator in the National Cancer Data Base.

机构信息

Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2024 Apr 15;130(8):1210-1220. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35163. Epub 2023 Dec 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend the use of genomic assays such as OncotypeDx to aid in decisions regarding the use of chemotherapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. The RSClin prognostic tool integrates OncotypeDx and clinicopathologic features to predict distant recurrence and chemotherapy benefit, but further validation is needed before broad clinical adoption.

METHODS

This study included patients from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) who were diagnosed with stage I-III HR+/HER2- breast cancer from 2010 to 2020 and received adjuvant endocrine therapy with or without chemotherapy. RSClin-predicted chemotherapy benefit was stratified into low (<3% reduction in distant recurrence), intermediate (3%-5%), and high (>5%). Cox models were used to model mortality adjusted for age, comorbidity index, insurance, and race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

A total of 285,441 patients were identified for inclusion from the NCDB, with an average age of 60 years and a median follow-up of 58 months. Chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival only for those predicted to have intermediate (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.79) and high benefit per RSClin (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61-0.72). Consistent benefit was seen in the subset with a low OncotypeDx score (<26) and intermediate (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.82) or high (aHR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.86) RSClin-predicted benefit. No survival benefit with chemotherapy was seen in patients with a high OncotypeDx score (≥26) and low benefit per RSClin (aHR, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.41-6.99).

CONCLUSIONS

RSClin may identify high-risk patients who benefit from treatment intensification more accurately than OncotypeDx, and further prospective study is needed.

摘要

背景

指南建议使用基因组检测,如 OncotypeDx,以辅助决策是否对激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性(HR+/HER2-)乳腺癌进行化疗。RSClin 预后工具整合了 OncotypeDx 和临床病理特征,以预测远处复发和化疗获益,但在广泛临床应用之前,还需要进一步验证。

方法

本研究纳入了 2010 年至 2020 年期间在国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中诊断为 I-III 期 HR+/HER2-乳腺癌并接受辅助内分泌治疗联合或不联合化疗的患者。RSClin 预测的化疗获益分层为低(远处复发降低<3%)、中(3%-5%)和高(>5%)。使用 Cox 模型对年龄、合并症指数、保险和种族/民族调整后的死亡率进行建模。

结果

从 NCDB 中确定了 285441 例符合纳入标准的患者,平均年龄为 60 岁,中位随访时间为 58 个月。仅对预测具有中间获益(调整后的危险比[aHR],0.68;95%置信区间[CI],0.60-0.79)和高获益 per RSClin(aHR,0.66;95%CI,0.61-0.72)的患者,化疗与总生存改善相关。在低 OncotypeDx 评分(<26)和中间(aHR,0.66;95%CI,0.53-0.82)或高(aHR,0.71;95%CI,0.58-0.86)RSClin 预测获益的亚组中也观察到一致的获益。在高 OncotypeDx 评分(≥26)和低 RSClin 获益 per RSClin(aHR,1.70;95%CI,0.41-6.99)的患者中,化疗无生存获益。

结论

RSClin 可能比 OncotypeDx 更准确地识别受益于治疗强化的高危患者,需要进一步的前瞻性研究。

相似文献

1
Validation of the RSClin risk calculator in the National Cancer Data Base.
Cancer. 2024 Apr 15;130(8):1210-1220. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35163. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
6
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
8
High-dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell rescue for children with high-risk neuroblastoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 5;2015(10):CD006301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006301.pub4.
9
LHRH agonists for adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer in premenopausal women.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD004562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004562.pub4.
10
Hormonal therapies for early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Jul;11(26):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-134. doi: 10.3310/hta11260.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Genomic Risk for Late Breast Cancer Recurrence and Survival.
NEJM Evid. 2024 Aug;3(8):EVIDoa2300267. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300267. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
2
3
Development and validation of a clinical breast cancer tool for accurate prediction of recurrence.
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024 Jun 15;10(1):46. doi: 10.1038/s41523-024-00651-5.

本文引用的文献

5
Use of Adjuvant Bisphosphonates and Other Bone-Modifying Agents in Breast Cancer: ASCO-OH (CCO) Guideline Update.
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 1;40(7):787-800. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02647. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
8
Epidemiology of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review.
Cancer J. 2021;27(1):8-16. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000500.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验