Lutgendorf Monica A, Northup Megan, Budge Jeffrey, Snipes Marie, Overbey Jamie, Taylor Anne, Simsiman Amanda
Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD (Dr Lutgendorf).
Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA (Drs Northup and Simsiman).
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Nov 18;4(1):100292. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100292. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Induction of labor is common; however, the optimum clinical strategy for induction of labor is less clear. Variations in clinical practices related to induction of labor may lead to increased complications and longer induction of labor times.
This study aimed to analyze whether the implementation of an evidence-based standardized care pathway improves the clinical outcomes associated with induction of labor.
This was an approved quality improvement project implementing a clinical care pathway for induction of labor. Moreover, this was a retrospective cohort study of inductions of labor for 5 months before (January 2018 to May 2018) and 14 months after (August 2018 to September 2019) the implementation of the care pathway. The primary outcome was time from admission to delivery. Time from admission to delivery was stratified by mode of delivery. The secondary outcomes included chorioamnionitis, endometritis, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, and a composite of unanticipated outcomes (chorioamnionitis, endometritis, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, cesarean delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage). In addition, pathway adherence was analyzed. The outcomes were analyzed using 2-tailed tests for continuous data and the Fisher exact test and chi-square tests for categorical data. Propensity score matching was used to assess for confounding by potential covariates.
A total of 1471 inductions of labor were reviewed, with 392 inductions of labor before the implementation of the care pathway and 1079 inductions of labor after the implementation of the care pathway. The pathway was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the time from admission to delivery by 1.2 hours (from 23.4 to 22.2 hours; =.08). There was a nonsignificant increase in the time to cesarean delivery before (28.2 hours) and after (28.8 hours) protocol implementation (=.71). There was a significant decrease in the time to delivery by 1.7 hours for vaginal deliveries (from 22.2 to 20.5 hours) after protocol implementation (=.02). There was a significant decrease in chorioamnionitis (from 12.5% to 6.0%; odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.67), a significant decrease in endometritis (from 6.9% to 2.6%; odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.65), and a significant decrease in composite unanticipated outcomes (from 56.9% to 36.6%; odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.56) after the implementation of the care pathway. There was no significant difference in postpartum hemorrhage (from 7.9% to 6.1%; odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-1.22), neonatal intensive care unit admissions (from 18.1% to 14.0%; odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.02), or cesarean deliveries (from 19.6% to 20.1%; odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.40) after the implementation of the care pathway. Pathway adherence varied, ranging from 50% to 89%.
The introduction of a standardized induction of labor pathway was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the time from admission to delivery by 1.2 hours and improved pregnancy outcomes, including decreased infections and unanticipated outcomes. Further opportunities for improvements in clinical outcomes may be realized with increased compliance with the care pathway.
引产很常见;然而,引产的最佳临床策略尚不清楚。与引产相关的临床实践差异可能导致并发症增加和引产时间延长。
本研究旨在分析实施循证标准化护理路径是否能改善与引产相关的临床结局。
这是一项获批的质量改进项目,实施引产临床护理路径。此外,这是一项回顾性队列研究,对护理路径实施前(2018年1月至2018年5月)5个月和实施后(2018年8月至2019年9月)14个月的引产情况进行研究。主要结局是从入院到分娩的时间。从入院到分娩的时间按分娩方式分层。次要结局包括绒毛膜羊膜炎、子宫内膜炎、新生儿重症监护病房收治、剖宫产、产后出血以及意外结局综合指标(绒毛膜羊膜炎、子宫内膜炎、新生儿重症监护病房收治、剖宫产和产后出血)。此外,分析了路径依从性。连续数据采用双侧检验进行分析,分类数据采用Fisher精确检验和卡方检验进行分析。倾向得分匹配用于评估潜在协变量的混杂情况。
共回顾了1471例引产病例,护理路径实施前有392例引产,实施后有1079例引产。该路径与从入院到分娩的时间非显著性缩短1.2小时相关(从23.4小时降至22.2小时;P = 0.08)。方案实施前(28.2小时)和实施后(28.8小时)剖宫产时间无显著性增加(P = 0.71)。方案实施后,阴道分娩的分娩时间显著缩短1.7小时(从22.2小时降至20.5小时)(P = 0.02)。护理路径实施后,绒毛膜羊膜炎显著减少(从12.5%降至6.0%;优势比,0.44;95%置信区间,0.29 - 0.67),子宫内膜炎显著减少(从6.9%降至2.6%;优势比,0.36;95%置信区间,0.20 - 0.65),意外结局综合指标显著减少(从56.9%降至36.6%;优势比,0.46;95%置信区间,0.34 - 0.56)。护理路径实施后,产后出血(从7.9%降至6.1%;优势比,0.76;95%置信区间,0.48 - 1.22)、新生儿重症监护病房收治(从18.1%降至14.0%;优势比,0.74;95%置信区间,0.54 - 1.02)或剖宫产(从19.6%降至20.1%;优势比,1.03;95%置信区间,0.76 - 1.40)均无显著差异。路径依从性各不相同,范围为50%至89%。
引入标准化引产路径与从入院到分娩的时间非显著性缩短1.2小时相关,并改善了妊娠结局,包括感染减少和意外结局减少。随着对护理路径依从性的提高,可能会进一步改善临床结局。