Suppr超能文献

对侧与同侧电针对单侧全膝关节置换术后镇痛和康复效果的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effects of contralateral versus ipsilateral electroacupuncture for analgesia and rehabilitation after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Shenzhen Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.

Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Acupunct Med. 2024 Aug;42(4):183-193. doi: 10.1177/09645284231211601. Epub 2023 Dec 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a treatment for advanced knee osteoarthritis. Since postoperative pain affects rehabilitation, this study aimed to determine whether electroacupuncture (EA) contralateral to the surgical site is more effective than ipsilateral EA or sham EA in terms of relieving postoperative pain and promoting post-TKA rehabilitation.

METHODS

In this parallel, single-blind randomized controlled trial, 114 patients undergoing unilateral TKA were assigned to the contralateral EA (EA on the contralateral side + sham EA on the ipsilateral), ipsilateral EA (EA on the ipsilateral + sham EA on the contralateral side), or sham EA (sham EA on both sides) groups (n = 38 each). Treatment was performed once daily on postoperative days 1-3. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores, additional opioid doses via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scores, active/passive range of motion (AROM/PROM), swelling around the knee joint, and Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) scores were used for postoperative evaluation.

RESULTS

At 3 days postoperatively, the VAS scores, HSS scores, AROM/PROM, swelling around the knee, and HAMA scores in the contralateral EA and ipsilateral EA groups were significantly improved compared with baseline. In addition, VAS scores, HSS scores, PROM and swelling around the knee were significantly better in the contralateral and ipsilateral EA groups than in the sham EA group, but similar in the two true EA groups. Furthermore, PCA additional dose release was significantly higher in the sham EA group than in the two true EA groups (which did not significantly differ). At 10 days postoperatively, the HSS scores, AROM/PROM, and HAMA scores were better in the contralateral and ipsilateral EA groups than in the sham EA group, but similar in the two true EA groups.

CONCLUSION

Contralateral EA is more effective than sham EA for treating postoperative pain following TKA, but has an analgesic effect similar to that of ipsilateral EA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1800020297 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry).

摘要

目的

全膝关节置换术(TKA)是治疗晚期膝关节骨关节炎的一种方法。由于术后疼痛会影响康复,因此本研究旨在确定与手术部位相对侧的电针(EA)是否比同侧 EA 或假 EA 更能有效缓解术后疼痛并促进 TKA 后康复。

方法

在这项平行、单盲、随机对照试验中,将 114 例接受单侧 TKA 的患者分为对侧 EA(对侧 EA+同侧假 EA)、同侧 EA(同侧 EA+对侧假 EA)和假 EA(双侧假 EA)组(每组 38 例)。术后第 1-3 天每天进行一次治疗。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、患者自控镇痛(PCA)泵追加阿片类药物剂量、美国特种外科医院(HSS)膝关节评分、主动/被动关节活动度(AROM/PROM)、膝关节周围肿胀和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分进行术后评估。

结果

术后 3 天,对侧 EA 和同侧 EA 组的 VAS 评分、HSS 评分、AROM/PROM、膝关节周围肿胀和 HAMA 评分均较基线显著改善。此外,与假 EA 组相比,对侧和同侧 EA 组的 VAS 评分、HSS 评分、PROM 和膝关节周围肿胀均显著改善,但在两个真 EA 组之间无显著差异。此外,假 EA 组的 PCA 追加剂量释放显著高于两个真 EA 组(两组间无显著差异)。术后 10 天,对侧和同侧 EA 组的 HSS 评分、AROM/PROM 和 HAMA 评分均优于假 EA 组,但在两个真 EA 组之间无显著差异。

结论

与假 EA 相比,对侧 EA 治疗 TKA 后术后疼痛更有效,但镇痛效果与同侧 EA 相似。

试验注册号

ChiCTR1800020297(中国临床试验注册中心)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验