Tabarestani Troy Q, Salven David S, Sykes David A W, Bardeesi Anas M, Bartlett Alyssa M, Wang Timothy Y, Paturu Mounica R, Dibble Christopher F, Shaffrey Christopher I, Ray Wilson Z, Chi John H, Wiggins Walter F, Abd-El-Barr Muhammad M
Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham , North Carolina , USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham , North Carolina , USA.
Oper Neurosurg. 2024 Jul 1;27(1):14-22. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001046. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
There has been a rise in minimally invasive methods to access the intervertebral disk space posteriorly given their decreased tissue destruction, lower blood loss, and earlier return to work. Two such options include the percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion through the Kambin triangle and the endoscopic transfacet approach. However, without accurate preoperative visualization, these approaches carry risks of damaging surrounding structures, especially the nerve roots. Using novel segmentation technology, our goal was to analyze the anatomic borders and relative sizes of the safe triangle, trans-Kambin, and the transfacet corridors to assist surgeons in planning a safe approach and determining cannula diameters.
The areas of the safe triangle, Kambin, and transfacet corridors were measured using commercially available software (BrainLab, Munich, Germany). For each approach, the exiting nerve root, traversing nerve roots, theca, disk, and vertebrae were manually segmented on 3-dimensional T2-SPACE magnetic resonance imaging using a region-growing algorithm. The triangles' borders were delineated ensuring no overlap between the area and the nerves.
A total of 11 patients (65.4 ± 12.5 years, 33.3% female) were retrospectively reviewed. The Kambin, safe, and transfacet corridors were measured bilaterally at the operative level. The mean area (124.1 ± 19.7 mm 2 vs 83.0 ± 11.7 mm 2 vs 49.5 ± 11.4 mm 2 ) and maximum permissible cannula diameter (9.9 ± 0.7 mm vs 6.8 ± 0.5 mm vs 6.05 ± 0.7 mm) for the transfacet triangles were significantly larger than Kambin and the traditional safe triangles, respectively ( P < .001).
We identified, in 3-dimensional, the borders for the transfacet corridor: the traversing nerve root extending inferiorly until the caudal pedicle, the theca medially, and the exiting nerve root superiorly. These results illustrate the utility of preoperatively segmenting anatomic landmarks, specifically the nerve roots, to help guide decision-making when selecting the optimal operative approach.
鉴于微创方法对椎间盘间隙后方的侵入性降低,组织破坏减少、失血较少且能更早重返工作岗位,此类方法的应用呈上升趋势。两种此类方法包括经坎宾三角的经皮腰椎椎间融合术和内镜下经关节突入路。然而,若无准确的术前可视化,这些入路存在损伤周围结构尤其是神经根的风险。利用新型分割技术,我们的目标是分析安全三角、经坎宾三角和经关节突通道的解剖边界及相对大小,以协助外科医生规划安全入路并确定套管直径。
使用商用软件(德国慕尼黑的BrainLab)测量安全三角、坎宾三角和经关节突通道的面积。对于每种入路,在三维T2-SPACE磁共振成像上使用区域生长算法手动分割出椎间孔外神经根、走行神经根、硬脊膜囊、椎间盘和椎体。划定三角形边界,确保该区域与神经之间无重叠。
对11例患者(65.4±12.5岁,33.3%为女性)进行了回顾性分析。在手术节段双侧测量坎宾三角、安全三角和经关节突通道。经关节突三角形的平均面积(分别为124.1±19.7mm²、83.0±11.7mm²、49.5±11.4mm²)和最大允许套管直径(分别为9.9±0.7mm、6.8±0.5mm、6.05±0.7mm)明显大于坎宾三角和传统安全三角(P<0.001)。
我们在三维空间中确定了经关节突通道的边界:走行神经根向下延伸至下位椎弓根,内侧为硬脊膜囊,上方为椎间孔外神经根。这些结果说明了术前分割解剖标志(特别是神经根)在选择最佳手术入路时指导决策的实用性。