Department of Operative Dentistry, RAK College of Dental Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al-Khaimah, United Arab Emirates, Phone: +971 7 2222593, e-mail:
Department of Operative Dentistry, RAK College of Dental Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al-Khaimah, United Arab Emirates.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023 Sep 1;24(9):674-678. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3569.
The conventional caries removal technique has been replaced with minimally invasive (MI) techniques to preserve healthy natural teeth and to provide durable dental restorations. Each of these MI caries removal protocols is reported to be favorable in dealing with different caries conditions. The current study aimed to trace the residual bacteria that may remain in a prepared cavity following a visual-tactile (VT), caries detection dye (CDD), and chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) protocol.
A total of 29 extracted human molar teeth with visible caries lesions were randomly divided into three groups. The cavity preparation and caries removal of each group was accomplished following one of the MI caries removal protocols. Swab samples (one from each specimen) were taken and inoculated onto a blood agar plate and incubated for 48 hours. The growth of the bacterial colony was observed under a microscope and the specific genome of the bacteria was identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test.
The maximum number of traceable bacteria was observed following the chemo-mechanical caries removal group followed by the caries detection dye group and the least in the visual-tactile group. The PCR test revealed the presence of in all the observed colonies; however, was absent completely. The Chi-square test reveals a statistically insignificant ( = 0.646) difference among the tested groups.
All of the MI caries removal protocols used in this study showed a trace of microbes in certain teeth. The cavity prepared following a visual tactile protocol showed the least amount of traceable bacteria in the prepared cavity.
Cavity that is prepared following individual MI protocol has a risk of leaving microbes in it.
传统的龋齿去除技术已被微创(MI)技术所取代,以保留健康的天然牙齿并提供持久的牙科修复体。这些 MI 龋齿去除方案中的每一种都被认为在处理不同的龋齿状况时是有利的。本研究旨在追踪在视觉触觉(VT)、龋齿检测染料(CDD)和化学机械性龋齿去除(CMCR)方案后,可能残留在预备腔中的残留细菌。
总共 29 颗具有可见龋损的人磨牙随机分为三组。每组的窝洞制备和龋齿去除均按照 MI 龋齿去除方案之一进行。从每个标本中取出一个拭子样本并接种到血琼脂平板上,孵育 48 小时。在显微镜下观察细菌菌落的生长情况,并通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)试验鉴定细菌的特定基因组。
在化学机械性龋齿去除组后观察到可追踪细菌的数量最多,其次是龋齿检测染料组,最少的是视觉触觉组。PCR 试验显示所有观察到的菌落中都存在 ,但完全不存在 。卡方检验显示测试组之间无统计学差异( = 0.646)。
本研究中使用的所有 MI 龋齿去除方案在某些牙齿中都显示出微生物的痕迹。按照视觉触觉方案预备的窝洞在预备窝洞中显示出可追踪细菌的数量最少。
根据个别 MI 方案制备的窝洞有在其中留下微生物的风险。