Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌多基因风险评分对降低风险内分泌治疗的影响:遗传风险估计(GENRE)试验 1 年和 2 年随访。

Breast Cancer Polygenic-Risk Score Influence on Risk-Reducing Endocrine Therapy Use: Genetic Risk Estimate (GENRE) Trial 1-Year and 2-Year Follow-Up.

机构信息

Breast Diagnostic Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2024 Feb 2;17(2):77-84. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-23-0256.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Refinement of breast cancer risk estimates with a polygenic-risk score (PRS) may improve uptake of risk-reducing endocrine therapy (ET). A previous clinical trial assessed the influence of adding a PRS to traditional risk estimates on ET use. We stratified participants according to PRS-refined breast cancer risk and evaluated ET use and ET-related quality of life (QOL) at 1-year (previously reported) and 2-year follow-ups. Of 151 participants, 58 (38.4%) initiated ET, and 22 (14.6%) discontinued ET by 2 years; 42 (27.8%) and 36 (23.8%) participants were using ET at 1- and 2-year follow-ups, respectively. At the 2-year follow-up, 39% of participants with a lifetime breast cancer risk of 40.1% to 100.0%, 18% with a 20.1% to 40.0% risk, and 16% with a 0.0% to 20.0% risk were taking ET (overall P = 0.01). Moreover, 40% of participants whose breast cancer risk increased by 10% or greater with addition of the PRS to a traditional breast cancer-risk model were taking ET versus 0% whose risk decreased by 10% or greater (P = 0.004). QOL was similar for participants taking or not taking ET at 1- and 2-year follow-ups, although most who discontinued ET did so because of adverse effects. However, these QOL results may have been skewed by the long interval between QOL surveys and lack of baseline QOL data. PRS-informed breast cancer prevention counseling has a lasting, but waning, effect over time. Additional follow-up studies are needed to address the effect of PRS on ET adherence, ET-related QOL, supplemental breast cancer screening, and other risk-reducing behaviors.

PREVENTION RELEVANCE

Risk-reducing medications for breast cancer are considerably underused. Informing women at risk with precise and individualized risk assessment tools may substantially affect the incidence of breast cancer. In our study, a risk assessment tool (IBIS-polygenic-risk score) yielded promising results, with 39% of women at highest risk starting preventive medication.

摘要

未加说明

利用多基因风险评分(PRS)细化乳腺癌风险估计,可能会提高降低风险的内分泌治疗(ET)的使用率。先前的临床试验评估了在传统风险评估中加入 PRS 对 ET 使用的影响。我们根据 PRS 细化的乳腺癌风险对参与者进行分层,并在 1 年(之前已报道)和 2 年随访时评估 ET 的使用情况和 ET 相关的生活质量(QOL)。在 151 名参与者中,58 人(38.4%)开始使用 ET,22 人(14.6%)在 2 年内停止使用 ET;42 人(27.8%)和 36 人(23.8%)在 1 年和 2 年随访时分别使用 ET。在 2 年随访时,40.1%至 100.0%终生乳腺癌风险、20.1%至 40.0%风险和 0.0%至 20.0%风险的参与者中有 39%正在服用 ET(总体 P=0.01)。此外,与传统乳腺癌风险模型中添加 PRS 后风险降低 10%或更多的参与者相比,PRS 增加 10%或更多乳腺癌风险的参与者中有 40%正在服用 ET(风险降低 10%或更多的参与者中无 0%正在服用 ET)(P=0.004)。虽然大多数停止使用 ET 的人是因为副作用,但在 1 年和 2 年随访时,服用或不服用 ET 的参与者的 QOL 相似。然而,由于 QOL 调查之间的时间间隔较长且缺乏基线 QOL 数据,这些 QOL 结果可能存在偏差。PRS 告知的乳腺癌预防咨询具有持久但逐渐减弱的效果。需要进一步的随访研究来解决 PRS 对 ET 依从性、ET 相关 QOL、补充性乳腺癌筛查和其他降低风险行为的影响。

预防相关性

乳腺癌的降低风险药物的使用大大不足。利用精确和个体化的风险评估工具为高危女性提供信息,可能会显著影响乳腺癌的发病率。在我们的研究中,风险评估工具(IBIS-多基因风险评分)取得了有希望的结果,40%的最高风险女性开始预防性用药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验