Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North-15 West-7, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Int J Clin Oncol. 2024 Mar;29(3):241-247. doi: 10.1007/s10147-023-02450-7. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
Whether concurrent chemotherapy with radiotherapy (CRT) is effective for elderly patients with head and neck cancer is a controversial topic. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of CRT vs. radiation therapy (RT) among elderly patients in Japan.
Data from the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan were extracted and analyzed. Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx who received definitive CRT or RT between 2011 and 2014 were included.
CRT was administered to 78% of the 1057 patients aged ≥ 70 years and 67% of the 555 patients aged ≥ 75 years. For the patients aged ≥ 75 years, the overall survival (OS) rate was significantly better in the CRT group than in the RT group (P < 0.05), while the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was not significantly different (P > 0.05). The add-on effect of CRT was significantly poor in elderly patients (P < 0.05), and it was not a significant factor in the multivariate analysis for patients aged ≥ 75 years. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the OS and PFS rates between the patients aged ≥ 70 years and those aged ≥ 75 years (all, P > 0.05).
Although aggressive CRT is administered to elderly patients in Japan, its effectiveness is uncertain. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to verify whether CRT is superior to RT alone for elderly patients.
同期放化疗(CRT)是否对老年头颈部癌症患者有效是一个有争议的话题。本研究旨在分析日本老年患者 CRT 与放疗(RT)的疗效。
从日本头颈部癌症登记处提取并分析数据。纳入 2011 年至 2014 年间接受根治性 CRT 或 RT 的局部晚期口咽、下咽或喉鳞状细胞癌患者。
1057 例年龄≥70 岁的患者中,78%接受 CRT,555 例年龄≥75 岁的患者中,67%接受 CRT。对于年龄≥75 岁的患者,CRT 组的总生存(OS)率明显高于 RT 组(P<0.05),但无进展生存(PFS)率无明显差异(P>0.05)。CRT 的附加效应在老年患者中明显较差(P<0.05),且在多变量分析中不是年龄≥75 岁患者的显著因素。经过倾向评分匹配后,年龄≥70 岁和年龄≥75 岁的患者 OS 和 PFS 率无显著差异(均 P>0.05)。
尽管日本老年患者接受了积极的 CRT,但疗效不确定。需要进一步的前瞻性随机试验来验证 CRT 是否优于单纯 RT 治疗老年患者。