• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《工作认知功能问卷》意大利语版的心理测量学特性和常模数据:一种在工作中检测主观认知抱怨的筛查工具。

Psychometric properties and normative data of the Italian version of the Cognitive Function at Work Questionnaire: a screening tool for detecting subjective cognitive complaints at work.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.

Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Neurol Sci. 2024 Jun;45(6):2593-2603. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-07265-y. Epub 2023 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10072-023-07265-y
PMID:38155286
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Considering the extension of working life due to socioeconomic and political factors, many people may experience cognitive complaints (CC) at their workplace, with severe consequences on their quality of life. The identification of workers reporting significative SCC is crucial to eventually address them to an objective neuropsychological evaluation and implement cognitive interventions to guarantee workers' well-being. Since no Italian questionnaires for detecting CC were designed for occupational settings, the aim of the study was to validate the Italian version of the Cognitive Function at Work Questionnaire (CFWQ) and to provide its normative data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity, and factorial structure of the CFWQ were evaluated. A regression-based procedure served to compute percentiles of CFWQ and its subscales.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty-one participants without psychiatric and/or neurological disorders completed the survey. We found that the Italian CFWQ included 26 items, with a good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.897) and a six-factor structure (memory, language, processing speed, abstract thinking/behavioral control, behavioral inertia, planning ability). CFWQ score did not correlate with empathy but correlated strongly with memory scores and moderately with anxiety and depression scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian CFWQ showed good psychometric properties, in analogy with the original English scale. Therefore, it can be successfully employed in organizational contexts to possibly identify workers with CC and therefore with possible co-occurrent psychological, behavioral, and cognitive consequences.

摘要

简介

由于社会经济和政治因素的影响,人们的工作寿命得以延长,许多人可能会在工作场所出现认知主诉(CC),这对他们的生活质量有严重影响。识别出报告有显著 SCC 的工人对于最终对他们进行客观的神经心理学评估并实施认知干预以保障工人的福祉至关重要。由于没有针对职业环境设计的用于检测 CC 的意大利问卷,因此本研究的目的是验证认知功能在工作中的问卷(CFWQ)的意大利语版本并提供其常模数据。

材料和方法

评估了 CFWQ 的内部一致性、收敛和发散效度以及因子结构。基于回归的程序用于计算 CFWQ 及其子量表的百分位数。

结果

421 名无精神或神经障碍的参与者完成了调查。我们发现,意大利语 CFWQ 包含 26 个项目,具有良好的内部一致性(克朗巴赫 α=0.897)和六因子结构(记忆、语言、处理速度、抽象思维/行为控制、行为惯性、计划能力)。CFWQ 得分与同理心无关,但与记忆力得分高度相关,与焦虑和抑郁得分中度相关。

结论

意大利语 CFWQ 具有良好的心理测量特性,与原始英语量表相似。因此,它可以成功地用于组织环境中,以可能识别出有 CC 的工人,从而可能存在同时存在的心理、行为和认知后果。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties and normative data of the Italian version of the Cognitive Function at Work Questionnaire: a screening tool for detecting subjective cognitive complaints at work.《工作认知功能问卷》意大利语版的心理测量学特性和常模数据:一种在工作中检测主观认知抱怨的筛查工具。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Jun;45(6):2593-2603. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-07265-y. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
2
The Cognitive Function at Work Questionnaire (CFWQ): A new scale for measuring cognitive complaints in occupational population.工作中的认知功能问卷(CFWQ):一种用于测量职业人群认知主诉的新量表。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2023 Nov-Dec;30(6):649-660. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1970553. Epub 2021 Sep 5.
3
The Cognitive Function at Work Questionnaire in memory clinic setting: a validation study.认知功能在记忆门诊中的作用问卷:一项验证研究。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2023 May;45(4):365-376. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2023.2239508. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
4
Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the multifactorial memory questionnaire for adults and the elderly.成人及老年人多因素记忆问卷意大利语版本的心理测量特性。
Neurol Sci. 2016 May;37(5):681-91. doi: 10.1007/s10072-016-2562-5. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
5
Evaluation of apathy in non-clinical populations: validation, psychometric properties, and normative data of the Italian version of Apathy-Motivation Index (AMI).非临床人群淡漠评估:意大利版淡漠动机量表(AMI)的验证、心理测量学特性和常模数据。
Neurol Sci. 2023 Sep;44(9):3099-3106. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06774-0. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
6
Neuropsychiatric symptoms and metamemory across the life span: psychometric properties of the German Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ).神经精神症状和整个生命周期的元记忆:德国多因素记忆问卷(MMQ)的心理测量特性。
J Neurol. 2024 Jul;271(7):4551-4565. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12402-4. Epub 2024 May 8.
7
Subjective cognitive rigidity and attention to detail: A cross-cultural validation of the Detail and Flexibility Questionnaire (DFlex) in a French clinical sample.主观认知僵化与关注细节:DFlex 问卷在法国临床样本中的跨文化验证
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Dec;42(10):1059-1071. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2020.1842333. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
8
Functional abilities and cognitive decline in adult and aging intellectual disabilities. Psychometric validation of an Italian version of the Alzheimer's Functional Assessment Tool (AFAST): analysis of its clinical significance with linear statistics and artificial neural networks.成年及老年智力残疾者的功能能力与认知衰退。阿尔茨海默病功能评估工具(AFAST)意大利语版的心理测量学验证:运用线性统计和人工神经网络分析其临床意义。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015 Apr;59(4):370-84. doi: 10.1111/jir.12113. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
9
Development of the Italian version of the 42-item Chronic Pain Coping Inventory, CPCI-I: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity.42 项慢性疼痛应对量表(CPCI-I)意大利语版的开发:跨文化调适、因子分析、信度和效度。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Aug;22(6):1459-65. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0271-y. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
10
Development and validation of the Italian version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale and its generalisability to apps targeting primary prevention.意大利语版移动应用程序评分量表的开发与验证及其对初级预防应用程序的通用性
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 7;16:83. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0323-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Vocabulary knowledge as a reliable proxy of cognitive reserve in multiple sclerosis: a validation study.词汇知识作为多发性硬化症认知储备的可靠指标:一项验证性研究。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Aug;45(8):3931-3938. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07388-w. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
Validation of the Italian version of the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease-Rating Scale (QUIP-RS) in an Italian Parkinson's disease cohort.帕金森病冲动控制障碍问卷评定量表(QUIP-RS)意大利语版本在意大利帕金森病队列中的效度验证。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Jul;45(7):3153-3161. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07304-2. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Functional cognitive disorder affects reaction time, subjective mental effort and global metacognition.功能性认知障碍会影响反应时间、主观心理努力和整体元认知。
Brain. 2023 Apr 19;146(4):1615-1623. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac363.
2
Metamemory mediates the protective effect of cognitive reserve on episodic memory during aging.元记忆中介认知储备对衰老过程中情景记忆的保护作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Aug;228:103627. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103627. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
3
Overall and sex-specific risk factors for subjective cognitive decline: findings from the 2015-2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey.
总体和性别特异性主观认知衰退的危险因素:来自 2015-2018 年行为风险因素监测系统调查的结果。
Biol Sex Differ. 2022 Apr 12;13(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13293-022-00425-3.
4
Validation of a short Italian version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-15) in non-clinical subjects: psychometric properties and normative data.巴瑞特冲动量表(BIS-15)意大利文短版在非临床人群中的验证:心理测量学特性和常模数据。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Aug;43(8):4719-4727. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06047-2. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
5
Effect of cognitive reserve on cognitive function in Parkinson's disease.认知储备对帕金森病患者认知功能的影响。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Jul;43(7):4185-4192. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-05985-1. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
6
Subjective cognitive failures and their psychological correlates in a large Italian sample during quarantine/self-isolation for COVID-19.主观认知失败及其在意大利大样本中 COVID-19 隔离/自我隔离期间的心理相关性。
Neurol Sci. 2021 Jul;42(7):2625-2635. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05268-1. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
7
Distinct Profile Differences in Subjective Cognitive Decline in the General Public Are Associated with Metacognition, Negative Affective Symptoms, Neuroticism, Stress, and Poor Quality of Life.公众主观认知下降的个体差异与元认知、负性情绪症状、神经质、压力和生活质量差有关。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(3):1231-1242. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200882.
8
Age and gender disparities in depression and subjective cognitive decline-related outcomes.抑郁和主观认知衰退相关结局的年龄和性别差异。
Aging Ment Health. 2022 Jan;26(1):48-55. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1861214. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
9
Subjective cognitive decline, anxiety symptoms, and the risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia.主观认知衰退、焦虑症状与轻度认知障碍和痴呆症的风险。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020 Sep 11;12(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00673-8.
10
The characterisation of subjective cognitive decline.主观认知下降的特征。
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Mar;19(3):271-278. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30368-0. Epub 2020 Jan 17.