Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Resuscitation Science Center, CHOP Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr 1;52(4):551-562. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006153. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
The objective of this study was to determine the association of the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) with survival to hospital discharge in pediatric patients with a noncardiac illness category. A secondary objective was to report on trends in ECPR usage in this population for 20 years.
Retrospective multicenter cohort study.
Hospitals contributing data to the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry between 2000 and 2021.
Children (<18 yr) with noncardiac illness category who received greater than or equal to 30 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for in-hospital cardiac arrest.
None.
Propensity score weighting balanced ECPR and conventional CPR (CCPR) groups on hospital and patient characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression incorporating these scores tested the association of ECPR with survival to discharge. A Bayesian logistic regression model estimated the probability of a positive effect from ECPR. A secondary analysis explored temporal trends in ECPR utilization. Of 875 patients, 159 received ECPR and 716 received CCPR. The median age was 1.0 [interquartile range: 0.2-7.0] year. Most patients (597/875; 68%) had a primary diagnosis of respiratory insufficiency. Median CPR duration was 45 [35-63] minutes. ECPR use increased over time ( p < 0.001). We did not identify differences in survival to discharge between the ECPR group (21.4%) and the CCPR group (16.2%) in univariable analysis ( p = 0.13) or propensity-weighted multivariable logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio 1.42 [95% CI, 0.84-2.40; p = 0.19]). The Bayesian model estimated an 85.1% posterior probability of a positive effect of ECPR on survival to discharge.
ECPR usage increased substantially for the last 20 years. We failed to identify a significant association between ECPR and survival to hospital discharge, although a post hoc Bayesian analysis suggested a survival benefit (85% posterior probability).
本研究旨在确定体外心肺复苏(ECPR)在非心脏疾病类别的儿科患者中的应用与出院生存率的相关性。次要目的是报告 20 年来该人群中 ECPR 使用的趋势。
回顾性多中心队列研究。
2000 年至 2021 年期间向美国心脏协会 Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation 注册中心提供数据的医院。
接受大于或等于 30 分钟院内心脏骤停心肺复苏(CPR)的非心脏疾病类别的儿童(<18 岁)。
无。
倾向评分加权平衡 ECPR 和常规心肺复苏(CCPR)组在医院和患者特征方面的差异。纳入这些评分的多变量逻辑回归测试了 ECPR 与出院生存率的相关性。贝叶斯逻辑回归模型估计了 ECPR 产生积极效果的概率。二次分析探索了 ECPR 使用的时间趋势。在 875 名患者中,159 名接受了 ECPR,716 名接受了 CCPR。中位年龄为 1.0 [四分位距:0.2-7.0]岁。大多数患者(875 例中的 597 例;68%)有呼吸功能不全的主要诊断。CPR 持续时间中位数为 45 [35-63] 分钟。随着时间的推移,ECPR 的使用有所增加(p<0.001)。在单变量分析中,ECPR 组(21.4%)与 CCPR 组(16.2%)之间的出院生存率无差异(p=0.13),或在倾向评分加权多变量逻辑回归中无差异(调整后比值比 1.42[95%CI,0.84-2.40;p=0.19])。贝叶斯模型估计 ECPR 对出院生存率的正面影响的后验概率为 85.1%。
在过去的 20 年中,ECPR 的使用大幅增加。我们未能确定 ECPR 与出院生存率之间存在显著相关性,尽管事后贝叶斯分析表明存在生存获益(85%的后验概率)。