Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Transpl Infect Dis. 2024 Feb;26(1):e14219. doi: 10.1111/tid.14219. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection has broad implications for morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients (RTR). Routine surveillance for CMV replication with PCR-based quantitative nucleic acid testing (qNAT) assays is standard practice in most transplant centers, but the impact of assay sensitivity on antiviral decision-making and virologic outcomes has not been studied. We investigated the effects of an ultrasensitive CMV qNAT assay on multiple clinical outcomes, including time to detection and duration of CMV DNAemia.
We conducted a single-center cohort study contrasting RTRs monitored with a qNAT with a higher lower limit of quantification (LLOQ >300 IU/mL) with those monitored with a more sensitive qNAT (LLOQ >35 IU/mL). Patients were stratified by donor (D)/recipient (R) CMV serostatus (D+/R-: high risk; any R+: moderate risk). CMV viral load monitoring was performed monthly post transplantation, with the primary outcomes being time to CMV DNAemia and its duration.
Total 1382 patients were analyzed from 2014 to 2016 and 2019 to 2021. Moderate-risk RTRs monitored with the more sensitive assay experienced a greater hazard for the development of a first episode of CMV DNAemia (aHR: 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.55-2.46) and an average of 24 (95% CI: 16.40-31.98) additional days of DNAemia. There was no difference in CMV end-organ disease or 1-year all-cause mortality between moderate-risk RTRs.
The more sensitive assay was associated with earlier detection and extended durations of CMV DNAemia in moderate-risk RTRs, without altering clinical outcomes. These findings inform optimal use of these assays and antiviral stewardship in RTRs.
The use of ultrasensitive CMV qNAT assays in moderate-risk CMV renal transplant recipients is associated with earlier detection and longer durations of CMV DNAemia without impacting CMV end-organ disease or 1-year mortality.
巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染对肾移植受者(RTR)的发病率和死亡率有广泛影响。大多数移植中心的标准做法是通过基于聚合酶链反应的定量核酸检测(qNAT)来常规监测 CMV 复制,但检测敏感性对抗病毒决策和病毒学结果的影响尚未得到研究。我们调查了超敏 CMV qNAT 检测对多种临床结果的影响,包括检测时间和 CMV DNA 血症持续时间。
我们进行了一项单中心队列研究,将使用具有较高下限定量(LLOQ>300IU/mL)的 qNAT 监测的 RTR 与使用更敏感的 qNAT(LLOQ>35IU/mL)监测的 RTR 进行对比。患者按供体(D)/受体(R)CMV 血清状态(D+/R-:高风险;任何 R+:中风险)分层。移植后每月进行 CMV 病毒载量监测,主要结局是 CMV DNA 血症的时间和持续时间。
2014 年至 2016 年和 2019 年至 2021 年期间共分析了 1382 例患者。使用更敏感检测的中风险 RTR 发生 CMV DNA 血症首次发作的风险更大(aHR:1.95,95%置信区间[CI]:1.55-2.46),且平均 DNA 血症时间延长 24 天(95%CI:16.40-31.98)。中风险 RTR 之间的 CMV 终末器官疾病或 1 年全因死亡率无差异。
在中风险 RTR 中,更敏感的检测与 CMV DNA 血症的更早检测和持续时间延长相关,而不会改变临床结局。这些发现为 RTR 中这些检测的最佳使用和抗病毒管理提供了信息。