Zulkifli Nur Ariessa Farhana, Mohd Saaid Nur Aliya Syuhada, Alias Aspalilah, Mohamed Ibrahim Nurjehan, Woon Choy Ker, Kurniawan Arofi, Prakoeswa Beshlina Fitri Widayanti Roosyanto
Department of Basic Sciences and Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia.
Department of Forensic Odontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2023 Jun 7;18(6):1435-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.05.020. eCollection 2023 Dec.
In this study, the sizes and forms of mandibles in various age groups of the Malay population were measured and compared.
Geometric morphometric (GM) analysis of mandibles from 400 dental panoramic tomography (DPT) specimens was conducted. The MorphoJ program was used to perform generalized Procrustes analysis (GPA), Procrustes ANOVA, principal component analysis (PCA), discriminant function analysis (DFA), and canonical variate analysis (CVA). In the tpsDig2 program, the 27 landmarks were applied to the DPT radiographs. Variations in mandibular size and form were categorized into four age groups: group 1 (15-24 years), group 2 (25-34 years), group 3 (35-44 years), and group 4 (45-54 years).
The diversity in mandibular shape among the first eight principal components was 81%. Procrustes ANOVA revealed significant shape differences (P < 0.001) among age groups. Mahalanobis distances indicated substantial differences among all age groups; group 1 and group 4 scored highest, at 2.114. The ranges for the cross-validation and discriminant function tests were 90-72% and 81-49%, respectively.
GM analysis through radiography is a simple, non-invasive, and non-destructive method of estimating age by using the mandible. GM analysis is unique because it can visualize the changes in mandible shape among age groups. This method should aid in age identification in forensic odontology investigations.
在本研究中,对马来人群不同年龄组的下颌骨大小和形态进行测量并比较。
对400例牙科全景断层扫描(DPT)标本的下颌骨进行几何形态测量(GM)分析。使用MorphoJ程序进行广义普氏分析(GPA)、普氏方差分析、主成分分析(PCA)、判别函数分析(DFA)和典型变量分析(CVA)。在tpsDig2程序中,将27个地标点应用于DPT射线照片。下颌骨大小和形态的变化分为四个年龄组:第1组(15 - 24岁)、第2组(25 - 34岁)、第3组(35 - 44岁)和第4组(45 - 54岁)。
前八个主成分中下颌骨形状的多样性为81%。普氏方差分析显示年龄组之间存在显著的形状差异(P < 0.001)。马氏距离表明所有年龄组之间存在显著差异;第1组和第4组得分最高,为2.114。交叉验证和判别函数测试的范围分别为90 - 72%和81 - 49%。
通过射线照相进行GM分析是一种利用下颌骨估计年龄的简单、非侵入性和非破坏性方法。GM分析的独特之处在于它可以可视化不同年龄组下颌骨形状的变化。该方法应有助于法医牙科学调查中的年龄鉴定。