Suppr超能文献

使用马镫时三种用于截石位摆放和重新摆放的床上操作技术的随机对照比较研究。

A Randomized Controlled Comparative Study of the Three Over-Bed Techniques for Positioning and Repositioning the Lithotomy Position While Using Stirrups.

作者信息

Zhang Ling-Ling, Luo Zhi-Fang, Yang Guang-Jing

机构信息

Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Hunan, People's Republic of China.

Department of Operating Room, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Dec 27;16:4255-4264. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S435570. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the clinical application and efficacy of three different methods for placing and repositioning patients in the lithotomy position over the bed using stirrups were evaluated.

METHODS

A total of 240 surgical patients who underwent surgery in Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital between July and November 2022 were selected as study participants. Using envelopes, they were randomly divided into three groups of 80 cases each using a randomization method. The groups included the traditional over-bed method, the postural trolley-assisted over-bed method, and the direct over-bed method. Using the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test, analysis of variance, and multiple linear regression equations, the placement time, over-bed repositioning time, and total time of the three methods for placing and repositioning in the lithotomy position supported by stirrups were analyzed statistically. In addition, we investigated and examined the satisfaction of nurses and doctors with the aforementioned techniques.

RESULTS

The placement time, repositioning time, and total time were significantly higher for the traditional over-bed method than for the postural trolley-assisted over-bed method and the direct over-bed method (both < 0.01). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the postural trolley-assisted over-bed method and the direct over-bed method ( > 0.05). Nurses and doctors reported significantly higher satisfaction with the postural trolley-assisted over-bed method and the direct over-bed method compared to the traditional over-bed method (both < 0.01). In addition, nurses were more satisfied with the direct over-bed method than the postural trolley-assisted over-bed method ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate that the direct over-bed method is preferred for positioning and repositioning patients in the lithotomy position with the support of stirrups.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了三种使用马镫在床旁将患者放置和重新放置于截石位的不同方法的临床应用及效果。

方法

选取2022年7月至11月在重庆市中医院接受手术的240例外科患者作为研究对象。采用信封法,通过随机化方法将他们随机分为三组,每组80例。分组包括传统床旁法、体位推车辅助床旁法和直接床旁法。使用Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验、方差分析和多元线性回归方程,对三种使用马镫支撑的截石位放置和重新放置方法的放置时间、床旁重新放置时间和总时间进行统计学分析。此外,我们调查并检查了护士和医生对上述技术的满意度。

结果

传统床旁法的放置时间、重新放置时间和总时间显著高于体位推车辅助床旁法和直接床旁法(均<0.01)。然而,体位推车辅助床旁法和直接床旁法之间无统计学显著差异(>0.05)。与传统床旁法相比,护士和医生对体位推车辅助床旁法和直接床旁法的满意度显著更高(均<0.01)。此外,护士对直接床旁法的满意度高于体位推车辅助床旁法(<0.05)。

结论

本研究结果表明,在马镫支撑下将患者放置和重新放置于截石位时,直接床旁法是首选方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef3/10758315/f4ba9a37c973/JMDH-16-4255-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验