Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London ON, Canada.
Clin J Pain. 2024 Mar 1;40(3):157-164. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001188.
The best available predictors of chronic pain development broadly encompass baseline metrics of cognition (ie, beliefs/expectations) about the trauma and resulting symptoms. In the context of musculoskeletal trauma, we have previously shown the Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale (TIDS) capable of risk-stratifying cohorts for chronic pain development. Here, we explore whether the physiological marker cortisol shows meaningful associations with cognitions predictive of pain outcomes.
Data for these cross-sectional analyses were drawn from an observational study that recruited 130 participants presenting to the hospital with pain related to a recent noncatastrophic Musculoskeletal trauma. Cortisol was measured from the participant's hair, saliva, and blood. In addition to pain and distress questionnaires, metadata such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), adverse childhood events, pretrauma stress levels, and pre-existing physical/psychological comorbidities were collected.
We found no significant associations between cortisol levels and pain or distress in isolation. When stratified by person-level variables, associations were revealed with distress (TIDS) in young age and low pretrauma stress subgroups (hair cortisol) and low BMI (blood cortisol). Through hierarchical regression analysis, we found the "cortisol X age" or "cortisol X stress" interaction terms significantly improved TIDS prediction beyond either variable in isolation (Age: ∆ R2 =15.1%; pretrauma stress: ∆ R2 =9.1%).
Our findings suggest that while linear correlations between pain-related distress and cortisol may be overly simplistic, certain person-level variables such as age, pretrauma stress, and BMI are worthy of consideration for experimental design or confounder characterization in future studies of pain and distress following musculoskeletal injuries especially when "trait" (hair) cortisol is the predictor variable.
慢性疼痛发展的最佳预测因子广泛包括对创伤和由此产生的症状的认知(即信念/预期)的基线指标。在肌肉骨骼创伤的背景下,我们之前已经表明,创伤伤害困扰量表(TIDS)能够对慢性疼痛发展的队列进行风险分层。在这里,我们探讨生理标志物皮质醇是否与预测疼痛结果的认知有意义的关联。
这些横断面分析的数据来自一项观察性研究,该研究招募了 130 名因近期非灾难性肌肉骨骼创伤而出现疼痛的患者。从参与者的头发、唾液和血液中测量皮质醇。除了疼痛和困扰问卷外,还收集了年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、不良童年事件、创伤前压力水平和先前存在的身体/心理合并症等元数据。
我们没有发现皮质醇水平与疼痛或困扰之间存在显著关联。当按个体变量分层时,在年轻和低创伤前压力亚组(头发皮质醇)以及低 BMI(血液皮质醇)中发现与困扰(TIDS)存在关联。通过层次回归分析,我们发现“皮质醇 X 年龄”或“皮质醇 X 压力”交互项显著提高了 TIDS 预测,超过了单独变量(年龄:∆ R2 = 15.1%;创伤前压力:∆ R2 = 9.1%)。
我们的研究结果表明,虽然疼痛相关困扰与皮质醇之间的线性相关性可能过于简单化,但某些个体变量,如年龄、创伤前压力和 BMI,在肌肉骨骼损伤后疼痛和困扰的未来研究中值得考虑用于实验设计或混杂因素特征化,特别是当“特质”(头发)皮质醇是预测变量时。