Suppr超能文献

超声检查对干燥综合征唾液腺活检的诊断准确性:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in relation to salivary gland biopsy in Sjögren's syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil.

Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 38405-320, Brazil.

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2024 Feb 8;53(2):91-102. doi: 10.1093/dmfr/twad007.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of major salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) in relation to minor salivary gland biopsy (mSGB) in the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome (SS).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Ten databases were searched to identify studies that compared the accuracy of SGUS and mSGB. The risk of bias was assessed, data were extracted, and univariate and bivariate random-effects meta-analyses were done.

RESULTS

A total of 5000 records were identified; 13 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and 10 in the quantitative synthesis. The first meta-analysis found a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.74-0.92) and specificity of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81-0.92) for the predictive value of SGUS scoring in relation to the result of mSGB. In the second meta-analysis, mSGB showed higher sensitivity and specificity than SGUS. Sensitivity was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.85) for mSGB and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.58-0.81) for SGUS, and specificity was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-0.97) for mSGB and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.94) for SGUS.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of SGUS was similar to that of mSGB. SGUS is an effective diagnostic test that shows good sensitivity and high specificity, in addition to being a good tool for prognosis and for avoiding unnecessary biopsies. More studies using similar methodologies are needed to assess the accuracy of SGUS in predicting the result of mSGB. Our results will contribute to decision-making for the implementation of SGUS as a diagnostic tool for SS, considering the advantages of this method.

摘要

目的

评估大唾液腺超声(SGUS)相对于小唾液腺活检(mSGB)在干燥综合征(SS)诊断中的准确性。

方法

进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了 10 个数据库,以确定比较 SGUS 和 mSGB 准确性的研究。评估了偏倚风险,提取了数据,并进行了单变量和双变量随机效应荟萃分析。

结果

共确定了 5000 条记录;13 项研究进行了定性综合分析,10 项研究进行了定量综合分析。第一项荟萃分析发现,SGUS 评分与 mSGB 结果相关的预测值的敏感性为 0.86(95%置信区间:0.74-0.92),特异性为 0.87(95%置信区间:0.81-0.92)。在第二项荟萃分析中,mSGB 的敏感性和特异性均高于 SGUS。mSGB 的敏感性为 0.80(95%置信区间:0.74-0.85),SGUS 的敏感性为 0.71(95%置信区间:0.58-0.81),mSGB 的特异性为 0.94(95%置信区间:0.87-0.97),SGUS 的特异性为 0.89(95%置信区间:0.82-0.94)。

结论

SGUS 的诊断准确性与 mSGB 相似。SGUS 是一种有效的诊断测试,具有良好的敏感性和较高的特异性,此外,它还是一种预测预后和避免不必要活检的良好工具。需要更多使用类似方法的研究来评估 SGUS 预测 mSGB 结果的准确性。我们的研究结果将有助于在考虑到该方法的优势的情况下,为实施 SGUS 作为 SS 的诊断工具做出决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验