Garber Andrea K, Cheng Jing, Accurso Erin C, Buckelew Sara M, Downey Amanda E, Le Grange Daniel, Gorrell Sasha, Kapphahn Cynthia J, Kreiter Anna, Moscicki Anna-Barbara, Golden Neville H
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Apr;57(4):859-868. doi: 10.1002/eat.24115. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
The StRONG trial demonstrated the safety and efficacy of higher calorie refeeding (HCR) in hospitalized adolescents and young adults with malnutrition secondary to restrictive eating disorders. Here we compare refeeding outcomes in patients with atypical anorexia nervosa (atypical AN) versus anorexia nervosa (AN) and examine the impact of caloric dose.
Patients were enrolled upon admission and randomized to meal-based HCR, beginning 2000 kcal/day and advancing 200 kcal/day, or lower calorie refeeding (LCR), beginning 1400 kcal/day and advancing 200 kcal every other day. Atypical AN was defined as %median BMI (mBMI) > 85. Independent t-tests compared groups; multivariable linear and logistic regressions examined caloric dose (kcal/kg body weight).
Among n = 111, mean ± SD age was 16.5 ± 2.5 yrs; 43% had atypical AN. Compared to AN, atypical AN had slower heart rate restoration (8.7 ± 4.0 days vs. 6.5 ± 3.9 days, p = .008, Cohen's d = -.56), less weight gain (3.1 ± 5.9%mBMI vs. 5.4 ± 2.9%mBMI, p < .001, Cohen's d = .51) and greater hypomagnesemia (29% vs. 11%, p = .03, OR = 3.29). These suboptimal outcomes were predicted by insufficient caloric dose (32.4 ± 6.9 kcal/kg in atypical AN vs. 43.4 ± 9.8 kcal/kg in AN, p < .001, Cohen's d = 1.27). For every 10 kcal/kg increase, heart rate was restored 1.7 days (1.0, 2.5) faster (p < .001), weight gain was 1.6%mBMI (.8, 2.4) greater (p < .001), and hypomagnesemia odds were 70% (12, 128) lower (p = .02).
Although HCR is more efficacious than LCR for refeeding in AN, it contributes to underfeeding in atypical AN by providing an insufficient caloric dose relative to the greater body weight in this diagnostic group.
The StRONG trial previously demonstrated the efficacy and safety of higher calorie refeeding in patients with malnutrition due to restrictive eating disorders. Here we show that higher calorie refeeding contributes to underfeeding in patients with atypical anorexia nervosa, including poor weight gain and longer time to restore medical stability. These findings indicate these patients need more calories to support nutritional rehabilitation in hospital.
STRONG试验证明了高热量再喂养(HCR)在因限制性饮食失调导致营养不良的住院青少年和青年中的安全性和有效性。在此,我们比较非典型神经性厌食症(非典型AN)与神经性厌食症(AN)患者的再喂养结果,并研究热量剂量的影响。
患者入院时登记并随机分为基于膳食的HCR组,从每天2000千卡开始,每天增加200千卡,或低热量再喂养(LCR)组,从每天1400千卡开始,每隔一天增加200千卡。非典型AN定义为%中位数BMI(mBMI)>85。独立t检验比较组间差异;多变量线性和逻辑回归分析热量剂量(千卡/千克体重)。
在n = 111例患者中,平均±标准差年龄为16.5±2.5岁;43%患有非典型AN。与AN相比,非典型AN的心率恢复较慢(8.7±4.0天对6.5±3.9天,p = 0.008,Cohen's d = -0.56),体重增加较少(3.1±5.9%mBMI对5.4±2.9%mBMI,p < 0.001,Cohen's d = 0.51),低镁血症更严重(29%对11%,p = 0.03,OR = 3.29)。这些次优结果可通过热量剂量不足来预测(非典型AN为32.4±6.9千卡/千克,AN为43.4±9.8千卡/千克,p < 0.001,Cohen's d = 1.27)。每增加10千卡/千克,心率恢复快1.7天(1.0,2.5)(p < 0.001),体重增加1.6%mBMI(0.8,2.4)(p < 0.001),低镁血症几率降低70%(12,128)(p = 0.02)。
尽管HCR在AN的再喂养中比LCR更有效,但相对于该诊断组中更大的体重,它提供的热量剂量不足,导致非典型AN喂养不足。
STRONG试验先前证明了高热量再喂养在因限制性饮食失调导致营养不良患者中的有效性和安全性。在此我们表明,高热量再喂养会导致非典型神经性厌食症患者喂养不足,包括体重增加不佳和恢复医学稳定性的时间更长。这些发现表明这些患者在医院需要更多热量来支持营养康复。