Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK.
Semin Diagn Pathol. 2024 Mar;41(2):79-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is classified into type 1 (IgG4-related) and type 2 (IgG4-unrelated) and the interpretation of pancreatic biopsy findings plays a crucial role in their diagnosis. Needle biopsy of type 1 AIP in the acute or subacute phase shows a diffuse lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, storiform fibrosis, obliterative phlebitis, and the infiltration of many IgG4-positive plasma cells. In a later phase, changes become less inflammatory and more fibrotic, making interpretations more challenging. Confirmation of the lack of 'negative' findings that are unlikely to occur in type 1 AIP (e.g., neutrophilic infiltration, abscess) is important to avoid an overdiagnosis. The number of IgG4-positive plasma cells increases to >10 cells/high-power field (hpf), and the IgG4/IgG-positive plasma cell ratio exceeds 40 %. However, these are minimal criteria and typical cases show >30 positive cells/hpf and a ratio >70 % even in biopsy specimens. Therefore, cases with a borderline increase in this number or ratio need to be diagnosed with caution. In cases of ductal adenocarcinoma, the upstream pancreas rarely shows type 1 AIP-like changes; however, the ratio of IgG4/IgG-positive plasma cells is typically <40 %. Although the identification of a granulocytic epithelial lesion (GEL) is crucial for type 2 AIP, this finding needs to be interpreted in conjunction with a background dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate. An isolated neutrophilic duct injury can occur in peritumoral or obstructive pancreatitis. Drug-induced pancreatitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease often mimics type 2 AIP clinically and pathologically. IL-8 and PD-L1 are potential ancillary immunohistochemical markers for type 2 AIP, requiring validation studies.
自身免疫性胰腺炎(AIP)分为 1 型(IgG4 相关)和 2 型(IgG4 不相关),胰腺活检结果的解读对其诊断起着至关重要的作用。1 型 AIP 的急性或亚急性阶段的针吸活检显示弥漫性淋巴浆细胞浸润、席纹状纤维化、闭塞性静脉炎和大量 IgG4 阳性浆细胞浸润。在后期阶段,病变变得炎症反应较少,纤维化较多,使得解读更加具有挑战性。确认缺乏不太可能发生在 1 型 AIP 中的“阴性”发现(例如中性粒细胞浸润、脓肿)非常重要,以避免过度诊断。IgG4 阳性浆细胞的数量增加到>10 个/高倍视野(hpf),且 IgG4/IgG 阳性浆细胞比值超过 40%。然而,这些是最低标准,典型病例即使在活检标本中也显示>30 个阳性细胞/hpf 和>70%的比值。因此,对于数量或比值略有增加的病例,需要谨慎诊断。在导管腺癌病例中,上游胰腺很少出现 1 型 AIP 样改变;然而,IgG4/IgG 阳性浆细胞的比值通常<40%。虽然粒细胞上皮病变(GEL)的识别对 2 型 AIP 至关重要,但这一发现需要结合致密淋巴浆细胞浸润的背景进行解读。孤立性中性粒细胞胆管损伤可发生于肿瘤周围或阻塞性胰腺炎中。炎症性肠病患者的药物诱导性胰腺炎在临床上和病理学上常模拟 2 型 AIP。IL-8 和 PD-L1 是 2 型 AIP 的潜在辅助免疫组化标志物,需要进行验证研究。