Fly clock, my clock, and lamin B receptor.

In the fruit fly , circadian rhythm was disrupted when the inner nuclear membrane protein lamin B receptor (LBR) was depleted from its clock neurons ( 118, e2019756118. 2021; https://doi.org/10. 1073/pnas.2019756118 and 6, 0139, 2023; https://doi.org/10.34133/research.0139). Ordinarily, the clock proteinPERIOD (PER) forms foci close to the inner nuclear membrane in the circadian clock's repression phase. The size, number, and location of foci near the nuclear membrane oscillate with a 24-h rhythm. When LBR was absent the foci did not form. The PER foci bring and other clock genes close to the nuclear envelope, where their transcription is silenced. Then, in the circadian clock's activation phase, the PER protein gradually gets degraded and the foci disappear. The clock genes, including , relocate to the nucleus interior where they resume transcription. Rhythmic re-positioning of clock genes between nucleus periphery and interior, correlates with their repression and activation in the circadian cycle. Absence of LBR disrupted this rhythm. Phosphorylation of PER promoted the formation of foci whereas dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A causedthem to disappear. LBR promoted focus formation by destabilizing the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 2A. The gene is no stranger to this journal. The first hint that vertebrate LBR is also a sterol biosynthesis enzyme, specifically, a sterol C14 reductase, was reported here (. 73, 33-41, 1994; https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/jgen/073/01/0033-0041). Mutations in the human gene cause a range of phenotypes--from the relatively benign Pelger-Huet anomaly to the perinatally lethal Greenberg skeletal dysplasia.Drosophila, like all insects, is a sterol auxotroph. The fly orthologue of vertebrate genes encodes a protein (dLBR) that shares several properties with vertebrate LBR proteins, with one notable exception. While human LBR complemented theyeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae erg24 mutant which lacks sterol C14 reductase activity, dLBR did not (, 2015-28, 2004; https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01052). Despite not possessing sterol reductase activity, dLBR retains significant sequence homology with vertebrate LBRs which have this activity. An undergraduate summer trainee in my laboratory obtained early (unpublished) evidence that dLBR lost sterol reductase activity during evolution. She transferred adult drosophila flies to vials containing a medium made of agar, dextrose, and dried and powdered mycelium of the filamentous fungus . On medium made with wild-type mycelium, theflies mated, laid eggs, hatched larvae, and developed pupae which eclosed progeny adult flies. The life cycle was no different than on 'regular' fly food composed of agar, dextrose and yeast extract. However, on a medium made with mycelium from a sterol C14 reductase null mutant, the flies laid eggs which hatched and released larvae, but the larvae failed to pupate, and no adult progeny flies emerged. This was because the fly lacks a sterol C14 reductase. The wild-type sterol, ergosterol, is a precursor of the steroid hormone ecdysone needed for molting and metamorphosis. Can expression of vertebrate LBR in dLBR-depleted fly clock neurons restore circadian rhythm? Can expression of vertebrate LBR enable flies to complete their life cycle on mutant medium? Does LBR regulate the vertebrate clock in a like manner? If yes, then is the sterol reductase activity dispensable in this role? These are some questions that came to my mind on a recent morning walk. The walk itself was a much-cherished outcome of my circadian clock.