Qeadan Fares, Tingey Benjamin, Mensah Nana Akofua
Parkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Department of Research and Evaluation, 2160 N 1st Ave, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2023 Dec 13;10:100210. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100210. eCollection 2024 Mar.
While the relationship between various obstetric procedures and the onset of opioid use disorder (OUD) remains ambiguous, this study aims to elucidate the immediate and prolonged risks of OUD in women who have undergone procedures such as vaginal and cesarean deliveries, induced abortions, and treatments related to miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies.
Retrospective data ( = 632,872) from the Cerner Real-World Data™ for pregnant females (age 15-44) between January 2010 and March 2020 were used. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare odds of OUD for each obstetric outcome to normal vaginal delivery using multivariable logistic regression. New opioid prescriptions and persistent opioid prescriptions were secondary outcomes for which modified Poisson regression models were used.
Compared to patients with a vaginal delivery, those with an ectopic pregnancy, a cesarean delivery, miscarriage, and an induced abortion had 84%, 46%, 119%, and 131% significantly higher odds of OUD (aOR [95% CI]: 1.84 [1.36, 2.48], 1.46 [1.29, 1.65], 2.19 [1.94, 2.47], and 2.31 [1.80, 2.96]) respectively. Among opioid naïve patients, all other obstetric procedure groups (besides miscarriage) had significantly higher risk of being prescribed new opioids than those with a vaginal delivery. Among those newly prescribed opioids, patients from all other obstetric procedure groups demonstrated a significantly higher risk of persistent opioid prescription compared to those who had a vaginal delivery.
The association between specific obstetric outcomes, notably miscarriage and induced abortions, and opioid use patterns should inform safer and more effective pain management in a maternal population.
虽然各种产科手术与阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的发病之间的关系仍不明确,但本研究旨在阐明接受过阴道分娩、剖宫产、人工流产以及与流产和异位妊娠相关治疗等手术的女性发生OUD的近期和长期风险。
使用了2010年1月至2020年3月期间来自Cerner真实世界数据™的15至44岁怀孕女性的回顾性数据(n = 632,872)。采用多变量逻辑回归分析,通过调整后的优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)来比较每种产科结局发生OUD的几率与正常阴道分娩的情况。新的阿片类药物处方和持续性阿片类药物处方是次要结局,采用修正泊松回归模型进行分析。
与阴道分娩的患者相比,异位妊娠、剖宫产、流产和人工流产的患者发生OUD的几率分别显著高出84%、46%、119%和131%(调整后的OR [95% CI]:1.84 [1.36, 2.48]、1.46 [1.29, 1.65]、2.19 [1.94, 2.47]和2.31 [1.80, 2.96])。在未使用过阿片类药物的患者中,除流产外,所有其他产科手术组被开具新阿片类药物的风险均显著高于阴道分娩的患者。在那些新开具阿片类药物的患者中,与阴道分娩的患者相比,所有其他产科手术组的患者持续性阿片类药物处方的风险显著更高。
特定产科结局,尤其是流产和人工流产,与阿片类药物使用模式之间的关联应为孕产妇群体提供更安全、更有效的疼痛管理依据。