Biçaker Ege, Trolio Vittoria, Miller Alexia E, Zhu Lisa Y, White Chloe, Racine Sarah E
Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, Social Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Apr;57(4):879-891. doi: 10.1002/eat.24134. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
Certain symptom and risk/maintenance factor similarities between individuals with atypical anorexia nervosa (AN) and 'typical' AN have been documented, but few studies have investigated how atypical AN compares to bulimia nervosa (BN). Further, the role of affective mechanisms in maintaining restrictive eating in atypical AN has not been examined. The current study investigated whether atypical AN resembles AN and/or BN on affect-related processes using questionnaires and ecological momentary assessment (EMA).
Women with atypical AN (n = 24), AN-restrictive subtype, (n = 27), AN-binge eating/purging subtype (n = 34), and BN (n = 58) completed questionnaires measuring depressive symptoms and emotion regulation difficulties. They also completed a 14-day EMA protocol during which they reported negative and positive affect and skipped meals five times/day (signal-contingent surveys) and restrictive eating after meals/snacks (event-contingent surveys).
Diagnostic groups generally did not differ on questionnaire measures nor affective patterns surrounding restrictive eating behaviors. Momentary changes in affect did not predict or follow restriction at meals/snacks, though higher momentary negative affect ratings predicted skipped meals, and higher positive affect was reported after skipped meals. Greater average negative affect and lower average positive affect predicted both restrictive eating behaviors.
Across diagnoses, reductions in food intake do not appear to be influenced by momentary changes in affect, though skipping meals may serve an emotion regulation function. Atypical AN seems to resemble AN and BN on affective processes underlying restrictive eating, raising further questions regarding the unique diagnosis of atypical AN.
Though atypical anorexia appears to strongly resemble anorexia nervosa, it is less clear how this disorder relates to bulimia nervosa. It is further unknown whether affective-related processes underlie restrictive eating in atypical anorexia nervosa, and how these processes compare to those in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Results suggest that atypical anorexia does not differ from anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa on emotion-related measures, nor in affective patterns surrounding restrictive eating behaviors.
非典型神经性厌食症(AN)患者与“典型”AN患者之间在某些症状以及风险/维持因素方面存在相似之处,这已得到证实,但很少有研究探究非典型AN与神经性贪食症(BN)相比情况如何。此外,情感机制在维持非典型AN的限制性饮食方面所起的作用尚未得到研究。本研究使用问卷调查和生态瞬时评估(EMA)来调查非典型AN在与情感相关的过程中是否与AN和/或BN相似。
患有非典型AN(n = 24)、AN限制型亚型(n = 27)、AN暴食/清除型亚型(n = 34)和BN(n = 58)的女性完成了测量抑郁症状和情绪调节困难的问卷调查。她们还完成了一个为期14天的EMA方案,在此期间,她们报告负面和正面情绪,并每天五次报告跳过正餐(信号依存性调查)以及餐后/吃零食后进行限制性饮食(事件依存性调查)。
诊断组在问卷调查指标以及围绕限制性饮食行为的情感模式方面通常没有差异。情感的瞬时变化并不能预测或伴随正餐/零食时的饮食限制,不过较高的瞬时负面情绪评分可预测跳过正餐,且跳过正餐之后报告的正面情绪更高。更高的平均负面情绪和更低的平均正面情绪可预测两种限制性饮食行为。
在所有诊断类型中,食物摄入量的减少似乎不受情感瞬时变化的影响,不过跳过正餐可能起到情绪调节功能。在限制性饮食背后的情感过程方面,非典型AN似乎与AN和BN相似,这就对非典型AN的独特诊断提出了更多问题。
尽管非典型神经性厌食症似乎与神经性厌食症极为相似,但这种疾病与神经性贪食症之间的关系尚不清楚。在非典型神经性厌食症中,与情感相关的过程是否是限制性饮食的基础,以及这些过程与神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症中的情况相比如何,也尚不清楚。结果表明,非典型神经性厌食症在与情绪相关的指标上,以及在围绕限制性饮食行为的情感模式方面,与神经性厌食症或神经性贪食症并无差异。