Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚全科医生对非药物干预措施的障碍和促进因素的态度、信念、行为和观点:一项全国性调查。

Attitudes, beliefs, behaviours and perspectives on barriers and enablers of Australian general practitioners towards non-drug interventions: a national survey.

机构信息

Institute for Evidence-based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia

Institute for Evidence-based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Fam Med Community Health. 2024 Jan 9;12(1):e002457. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002457.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many guidelines recommend non-drug interventions (NDIs) for managing common conditions in primary care. However, compared with drug interventions, NDIs are less widely known, promoted and used. We aim to (1) examine general practitioners' (GPs') knowledge, attitudes and practices for NDIs, including their use of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) Handbook of Non-Drug Interventions (HANDI), and (2) identify factors influencing their use of NDIs and HANDI.

METHODS

We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey of practicing GP members in Australia during October-November 2022. The survey contained five sections: characteristics of GP; knowledge and use of NDIs; attitudes towards NDIs; barriers and enablers to using HANDI; and suggestions of NDIs and ideas to improve the uptake of NDIs in primary care.

RESULTS

Of the 366 GPs who completed the survey, 242 (66%) were female, and 248 (74%) were ≥45 years old. One in three GPs reported that they regularly ('always') recommend NDIs to their patients when appropriate (34%), whereas one-third of GPs were unaware of HANDI (39%). GPs identified several factors that improve the uptake of HANDI, including 'access and integration of HANDI in clinical practice', 'content and support to use in practice' and 'awareness and training'.

CONCLUSIONS

While many GPs are aware of the effectiveness of NDIs and often endorse their use, obstacles still prevent widespread adoption in primary care. The results of this survey can serve as a foundation for developing implementation strategies to improve the uptake of effective evidence-based NDIs in primary care.

摘要

背景

许多指南建议在初级保健中采用非药物干预(NDIs)来管理常见疾病。然而,与药物干预相比,NDIs 的知晓度、推广度和使用率都较低。我们旨在:(1)考察全科医生(GP)对 NDIs 的知识、态度和实践,包括他们对澳大利亚皇家全科医师学院非药物干预手册(HANDI)的使用情况;(2)确定影响他们使用 NDIs 和 HANDI 的因素。

方法

我们在 2022 年 10 月至 11 月期间对澳大利亚的执业 GP 成员进行了一项基于网络的横断面调查。该调查包含五个部分:GP 的特征;NDIs 的知识和使用情况;对 NDIs 的态度;使用 HANDI 的障碍和促进因素;以及 NDIs 的建议和提高初级保健中 NDIs 使用率的想法。

结果

在完成调查的 366 名 GP 中,242 名(66%)为女性,248 名(74%)年龄≥45 岁。三分之一的 GP 报告说,他们在适当的时候(34%)经常(“总是”)向患者推荐 NDIs,而三分之一的 GP 不知道 HANDI(39%)。GP 们确定了一些可以提高 HANDI 使用率的因素,包括“HANDI 在临床实践中的获取和整合”、“在实践中使用的内容和支持”以及“意识和培训”。

结论

尽管许多 GP 意识到 NDIs 的有效性并经常认可其使用,但仍存在一些障碍,阻碍了其在初级保健中的广泛应用。本调查的结果可以为制定实施策略提供基础,以提高初级保健中有效循证 NDIs 的使用率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdbd/10806537/6e71f88dbed5/fmch-2023-002457f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验