• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨骨库处理中同种异体骨术中阳性培养在供体和受体术后继发感染中的作用。

Exploring the Role of Intraoperative Positive Culture of Allograft Bone in Subsequent Postoperative Infections among Donors and Recipients in Bone Bank Processing.

作者信息

Tsai Yao-Hung, Chen Hung-Yen, Huang Tsung-Yu, Chen Jiun-Liang, Kuo Liang-Tseng, Huang Kuo-Chin

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chia-Yi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan.

College of Medicine, Chang Gung University at Taoyuan, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 20;14(1):15. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010015.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14010015
PMID:38201323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10777897/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Allografts have been frequently used in orthopedic procedures. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the discard rates and bacterial contamination of a bone bank, and to assess the clinical outcomes of recipients with bacterial culture-positive donor allografts.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1764 allografts which were harvested from living donors and stored in a bone bank from 2018 to 2022. The donors whose allografts displayed bacterial contamination at retrieval of the primary hip or knee arthroplasty were followed for microbiology and subsequent prosthetic joint infection analysis. The infected pathogens, antibiotic treatment and subsequent infection were reviewed for the intraoperative positive culture group.

RESULTS

The discard rate was 17%, and the bacterial contamination rate of bone retrieval was 2.15%. Thirty-eight allografts at retrieval displayed confirmed bacterial growth, and 37 patients did not reveal infective signs at 6 months follow-up. A total of 1464 allografts were stored and implanted, among which 28 allografts (1.91%) were confirmed to be positive for bacterial growth and 13 cases (0.89%) were confirmed as surgical site infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results validate the suggestion that our bone bank system performs good quality monitoring to eliminate the risk of dissemination of viral and bacterial diseases and to decrease surgical site infection after allograft implantation. By ensuring aseptic conditions and contamination-reducing strategies during harvesting and thawing, the allografts can be safely stored and implanted while limiting bacterial contamination. Our findings confirm that the intraoperative positive cultures of allografts did not contribute to subsequent postoperative surgical site infection in donors and recipients.

摘要

背景

同种异体移植物在骨科手术中经常被使用。本研究的目的是评估骨库的废弃率和细菌污染情况,并评估接受细菌培养阳性供体同种异体移植物的受者的临床结局。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2018年至2022年从活体供体获取并储存在骨库中的1764例同种异体移植物。对在初次髋关节或膝关节置换术取出时显示细菌污染的移植物的供体进行微生物学及随后的人工关节感染分析。对术中培养阳性组的感染病原体、抗生素治疗及随后的感染情况进行了回顾。

结果

废弃率为17%,骨取出时的细菌污染率为2.15%。38例移植物在取出时显示有确诊的细菌生长,37例患者在6个月随访时未出现感染迹象。总共储存并植入了1464例同种异体移植物,其中28例(1.91%)被确认为细菌生长阳性,13例(0.89%)被确认为手术部位感染。

结论

我们的结果证实了我们的骨库系统进行了高质量监测以消除病毒和细菌疾病传播风险并降低同种异体移植术后手术部位感染的说法。通过在采集和解冻过程中确保无菌条件和减少污染的策略,同种异体移植物可以安全储存和植入,同时限制细菌污染。我们的研究结果证实,同种异体移植物术中培养阳性与供体和受者随后的术后手术部位感染无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d14/10777897/169813cc6dcc/diagnostics-14-00015-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d14/10777897/1914ff337508/diagnostics-14-00015-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d14/10777897/169813cc6dcc/diagnostics-14-00015-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d14/10777897/1914ff337508/diagnostics-14-00015-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d14/10777897/169813cc6dcc/diagnostics-14-00015-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the Role of Intraoperative Positive Culture of Allograft Bone in Subsequent Postoperative Infections among Donors and Recipients in Bone Bank Processing.探讨骨库处理中同种异体骨术中阳性培养在供体和受体术后继发感染中的作用。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 20;14(1):15. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010015.
2
Bacterial infections associated with allogenic bone transplantation.与同种异体骨移植相关的细菌感染。
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2015 May;72(5):427-30. doi: 10.2298/vsp1505427s.
3
A positive bacterial culture from allograft bone at implantation does not correlate with subsequent surgical site infection.植入时同种异体骨细菌培养呈阳性与随后的手术部位感染无关。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Mar;97-B(3):427-31. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B3.34600.
4
Infection and utilization rates of bone allografts in a hospital-based musculoskeletal tissue bank in north India.印度北部一家医院肌肉骨骼组织库中同种异体骨移植的感染率和利用率
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Oct 15;23:101635. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101635. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
How to improve donor skin availability: Pragmatic procedures to minimize the discard rate of cryopreserved allografts in skin banking.如何提高供体皮肤的可用性:在皮肤库中减少冷冻保存同种异体移植物废弃率的实用程序。
Burns. 2021 Mar;47(2):387-396. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
6
Microbial contamination of femoral head allografts.股骨头异体移植的微生物污染
Hong Kong Med J. 2004 Dec;10(6):401-5.
7
The effectiveness of bone banking in Central Serbia: audit of the first seven years.塞尔维亚中部骨库的有效性:头七年的审计
Cell Tissue Bank. 2014 Dec;15(4):567-72. doi: 10.1007/s10561-014-9426-0. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
8
Postmortem Retrieval of Arterial Allografts: Preliminary Results.动脉同种异体移植物的尸检获取:初步结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;52:201-206. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
9
The quality assessment of the University hospital bone bank in Central Serbia: the second audit after fourteen years.塞尔维亚中部大学医院骨库质量评估:十四年后的第二次审核。
Cell Tissue Bank. 2022 Jun;23(2):285-291. doi: 10.1007/s10561-021-09942-8. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
10
Quality control processes in allografting: A twenty-year retrospective review of a hospital-based bone bank in Taiwan.同种异体移植中的质量控制流程:台湾一家医院骨库的二十年回顾性研究
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 19;12(10):e0184809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184809. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Bacterial contamination of bone allografts in the tissue banks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.组织库中同种异体骨移植物的细菌污染:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2022 May;123:156-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.10.020. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
2
Infection and utilization rates of bone allografts in a hospital-based musculoskeletal tissue bank in north India.印度北部一家医院肌肉骨骼组织库中同种异体骨移植的感染率和利用率
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Oct 15;23:101635. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101635. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Principles of bone and tissue banking in Saudi Arabia: 10-year experience report.
沙特阿拉伯的骨和组织银行原则:10 年经验报告。
Cell Tissue Bank. 2021 Mar;22(1):93-101. doi: 10.1007/s10561-020-09868-7. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
4
Does intraoperative contamination during primary knee arthroplasty affect patient-reported outcomes for patients who are uninfected 1 year after surgery? A prospective cohort study of 714 patients.初次膝关节置换术中的术中污染是否会影响术后 1 年无感染患者的患者报告结局?一项 714 例患者的前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Dec;91(6):750-755. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1811552. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
5
Analysis of potential contamination factors in musculoskeletal tissues.
Cell Tissue Bank. 2018 Dec;19(4):659-666. doi: 10.1007/s10561-018-9717-y. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
6
Quality control processes in allografting: A twenty-year retrospective review of a hospital-based bone bank in Taiwan.同种异体移植中的质量控制流程:台湾一家医院骨库的二十年回顾性研究
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 19;12(10):e0184809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184809. eCollection 2017.
7
Intraoperative culture positive allograft bone and subsequent postoperative infections: a retrospective review.术中培养阳性的同种异体骨与术后感染:一项回顾性研究。
Can J Surg. 2017 Apr;60(2):94-100. doi: 10.1503/cjs.008016.
8
Infection in Bone Allograft Transplants.骨移植中的感染
Exp Clin Transplant. 2016 Oct;14(5):484-490.
9
Improving efficiency of a regional stand alone bone bank.提高地区独立骨库的效率。
Cell Tissue Bank. 2016 Mar;17(1):85-90. doi: 10.1007/s10561-015-9523-8. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
10
Living donor bone banking: processing and discarding--from procurement to therapeutic use.活体供体骨库:处理与废弃——从获取到治疗应用
Cell Tissue Bank. 2015 Dec;16(4):593-603. doi: 10.1007/s10561-015-9507-8. Epub 2015 Mar 27.