Lim Geok Hoon, Hoo Jing Xue, Shin You Chan, Choo Rachel Zhi Ting, Wong Fuh Yong, Allen John Carson
Breast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore 229899, Singapore.
Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 19;16(1):17. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010017.
Patients with bilateral breast cancers are uncommon and are associated with a poorer prognosis. While metastatic staging guidelines in patients with unilateral cancer were established, the indication of metastatic staging in patients with bilateral breast cancers is unclear. We aimed to determine which patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancers require metastatic staging at diagnosis. This is the first such reported study, to the best of our knowledge.
A retrospective review of newly diagnosed synchronous bilateral invasive breast cancer patients at our institution was performed. We excluded patients with malignant phyllodes or no metastatic staging. Patients' demographics and pathological and staging results were analysed to determine the group of bilateral breast cancer patients who required metastatic staging.
A total of 92 patients with synchronous bilateral invasive cancers were included. The mean age was 58 years old, and 64.1% had bilateral invasive ductal carcinoma. 23.9% had systemic metastasis. Nodal status was statistically significant for systemic metastasis on staging ( = 0.0081), with only three patients (3.3%) having negative nodal status and positive metastatic staging. These three patients, however, showed symptoms of distant metastasis. 92.3% of patients with negative nodes also had negative metastatic staging. Using negative nodal status as a guide avoided metastatic staging in 40.4% of all patients.
Negative nodal status was the most predictive factor for no systemic metastasis on staging in patients with synchronous bilateral invasive breast cancers. Hence, metastatic staging could be reserved for patients with symptoms of systemic metastasis and/or metastatic nodes. This finding could be validated in larger studies.
双侧乳腺癌患者并不常见,且预后较差。虽然已经制定了单侧乳腺癌患者的转移分期指南,但双侧乳腺癌患者转移分期的指征尚不清楚。我们旨在确定哪些同时性双侧乳腺癌患者在诊断时需要进行转移分期。据我们所知,这是第一项此类报道的研究。
对我院新诊断的同时性双侧浸润性乳腺癌患者进行回顾性研究。我们排除了患有恶性叶状肿瘤或未进行转移分期的患者。分析患者的人口统计学、病理和分期结果,以确定需要进行转移分期的双侧乳腺癌患者群体。
共纳入92例同时性双侧浸润性癌患者。平均年龄为58岁,64.1%患有双侧浸润性导管癌。23.9%发生了全身转移。分期时,淋巴结状态对全身转移具有统计学意义(P = 0.0081),只有3例患者(3.3%)淋巴结状态为阴性但转移分期为阳性。然而,这3例患者均表现出远处转移症状。淋巴结阴性的患者中92.3%转移分期也为阴性。以淋巴结阴性为指导,避免了40.4%的患者进行转移分期。
淋巴结阴性是同时性双侧浸润性乳腺癌患者分期时无全身转移的最具预测性的因素。因此,转移分期可保留给有全身转移症状和/或转移淋巴结的患者。这一发现可在更大规模的研究中得到验证。