• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测房颤导管消融术后结果的新评分:VAT-DHF

New Score for Predicting Results after Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: VAT-DHF.

作者信息

Nastasă Alexandrina, Bogdan Ștefan, Iorgulescu Corneliu, Radu Andrei Dan, Craițoiu-Nirlu Luminița, Vătășescu Radu Gabriel

机构信息

Cardiology Departament, Elias Universitary Emergency Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania.

Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 22;13(1):61. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010061.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13010061
PMID:38202068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10779542/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been proven to have the highest efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm. Several studies have proposed different scores for predicting post-procedural success, but most have not been validated in prospective cohorts. Further research is required to determine the optimal formulae.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify independent predictors of AF recurrence after CA and develop a composite score.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with persistent and paroxysmal AF who underwent CA were retrospectively analyzed. The independent predictors of recurrence were used to create a new predictive score.

RESULTS

The cohort included 263 patients with a follow-up of 37.6 ± 23.4 months. Persistent AF, f-waves < 0.1 mV, indexed left atrium volume, the presence of type 2 diabetes, and smaller height were independent predictors of recurrence and were used to create a new scoring model, VAT-DHF (V = Volume, AT = AF Type, D = Diabetes, H = Height, F = f waves). The ROC curve for this new score showed an AUC of 0.869, < 0.0001, 95% CI [0.802-0.936], while those for APPLE and CHADS-VASc showed an AUC of 0.765, 95% CI [0.637-0.893] and an AUC of 0.655, 95% CI [0.580-0.730], respectively. Patients who had a VAT-DHF score between 0 and 3.25, 3.25 and 6, and ≥6, had success rates of 95.7%, 76.3%, and 25% ( < 0.0001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel VAT-DHF score is easy to calculate and may be a useful clinical tool for identifying patients with a low, intermediate, or high risk of AF recurrence after CA.

摘要

引言

心房颤动(AF)导管消融术(CA)已被证明在维持窦性心律方面具有最高疗效。多项研究提出了不同的评分来预测术后成功率,但大多数尚未在前瞻性队列中得到验证。需要进一步研究以确定最佳公式。

目的

本研究旨在确定CA术后房颤复发的独立预测因素并制定一个综合评分。

方法

对连续接受CA的持续性和阵发性房颤患者进行回顾性分析。复发的独立预测因素用于创建一个新的预测评分。

结果

该队列包括263例患者,随访时间为37.6±23.4个月。持续性房颤、f波<0.1 mV、左心房容积指数、2型糖尿病的存在以及身高较矮是复发的独立预测因素,并用于创建一个新的评分模型VAT-DHF(V=容积,AT=房颤类型,D=糖尿病,H=身高,F=f波)。这个新评分的ROC曲线显示AUC为0.869,P<0.0001,95%CI[0.802-0.936],而APPLE和CHADS-VASc的AUC分别为0.765,95%CI[0.637-0.893]和0.655,95%CI[0.580-0.730]。VAT-DHF评分在0至3.25、3.25至6以及≥6之间的患者,成功率分别为9

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/10779542/36844d271f59/jcm-13-00061-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/10779542/7bbc985ad102/jcm-13-00061-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/10779542/3fc3653bc4b9/jcm-13-00061-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/10779542/cd86fc3bbf09/jcm-13-00061-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/10779542/36844d271f59/jcm-13-00061-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/10779542/7bbc985ad102/jcm-13-00061-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/10779542/3fc3653bc4b9/jcm-13-00061-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/10779542/cd86fc3bbf09/jcm-13-00061-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/10779542/36844d271f59/jcm-13-00061-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
New Score for Predicting Results after Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: VAT-DHF.预测房颤导管消融术后结果的新评分:VAT-DHF
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 22;13(1):61. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010061.
2
Comparison of CHADS2, R2CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for the prediction of rhythm outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry.比较 CHADS2、R2CHADS2 和 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分在预测心房颤动导管消融后节律转归中的作用:莱比锡心脏中心房颤消融登记研究。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Apr;7(2):281-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001182. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
3
CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores as predictors of left atrial ablation outcomes for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.CHADS2 和 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分作为预测阵发性心房颤动左心房消融结局的指标。
Europace. 2014 Feb;16(2):202-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut210. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
4
The APPLE score: a novel and simple score for the prediction of rhythm outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.苹果评分:一种用于预测房颤导管消融术后节律转归的新颖且简单的评分方法。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Oct;104(10):871-6. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0856-x. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
5
The APPLE Score - A Novel Score for the Prediction of Rhythm Outcomes after Repeat Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.苹果评分——一种预测房颤重复导管消融术后节律转归的新评分
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169933. eCollection 2017.
6
Very late arrhythmia recurrences in patients with sinus rhythm within the first year after catheter ablation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry.心脏中心房颤导管消融注册研究:窦性心律患者导管消融术后 1 年内极晚期心律失常复发。
Europace. 2019 Nov 1;21(11):1646-1652. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz233.
7
Prediction of Left Atrial Fibrosis and Success of Catheter Ablation by Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Patients Imaged in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.斑点追踪超声心动图对持续性心房颤动患者左心房纤维化及导管消融成功率的预测
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 25;9:856796. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.856796. eCollection 2022.
8
Renal dysfunction, stroke risk scores (CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and R2CHADS2), and the risk of thromboembolic events after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry.肾功能障碍、卒中风险评分(CHADS2、CHA2DS2-VASc 和 R2CHADS2)与心房颤动导管消融术后血栓栓塞事件风险:莱比锡心脏中心房颤消融登记研究。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Oct;6(5):868-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000869. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
9
Procedural Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.心力衰竭患者行导管消融治疗心房颤动的程序结局。
Am J Ther. 2019 May/Jun;26(3):e333-e338. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000931.
10
CHEST and CHADS-Vasc for predicting recurrence after catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.CHEST 和 CHADS-Vasc 评分系统用于预测阵发性心房颤动导管消融术后的复发。
Kardiologiia. 2023 Jun 30;63(6):52-60. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2023.6.n2426.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of AF Ablation Results by Advanced Left Atrial Function Assessment Using Strain Analysis and Left Atrial Appendage Emptying Velocity.通过使用应变分析和左心耳排空速度的高级左心房功能评估预测房颤消融结果
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2025 Jul 10;37(3):11. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1440. eCollection 2025.
2
Beyond Clinical Factors: Harnessing Artificial Intelligence and Multimodal Cardiac Imaging to Predict Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Post-Catheter Ablation.超越临床因素:利用人工智能和多模态心脏成像预测导管消融术后房颤复发
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Sep 19;11(9):291. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11090291.

本文引用的文献

1
A new prediction model for left ventricular systolic function recovery after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: The ANTWOORD Study.心力衰竭患者心房颤动导管消融后左心室收缩功能恢复的新预测模型:ANTWOORD 研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Jul 1;358:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.040. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
2
Internationally validated score to predict the outcome of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: the 'FLAME score'.用于预测非阵发性心房颤动消融治疗结果的国际验证评分:“FLAME 评分”。
Open Heart. 2021 Aug;8(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001653.
3
Predicting recurrent atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: a systematic review of prognostic models.
预测导管消融后心房颤动复发:预后模型的系统评价。
Europace. 2020 May 1;22(5):748-760. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa041.
4
Predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation in patients with heart failure: Validity of the APPLE and CAAP-AF risk scoring systems.预测心力衰竭患者消融术后房颤复发:APPLE和CAAP-AF风险评分系统的有效性
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Nov;42(11):1440-1447. doi: 10.1111/pace.13805. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
5
A novel score in the prediction of rhythm outcome after ablation of atrial fibrillation: The SUCCESS score.预测房颤消融术后节律转归的一种新评分:SUCCESS评分。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2019 Mar;21(3):142-149. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.76570.
6
Prediction of very late arrhythmia recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: The MB-LATER clinical score.预测房颤射频导管消融术后极晚期心律失常复发:MB-LATER 临床评分。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 20;7:40828. doi: 10.1038/srep40828.
7
Predicting atrial fibrillation ablation outcome: The CAAP-AF score.预测房颤消融结果:CAAP-AF评分
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Nov;13(11):2119-2125. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Jul 17.
8
The APPLE score: a novel and simple score for the prediction of rhythm outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.苹果评分:一种用于预测房颤导管消融术后节律转归的新颖且简单的评分方法。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Oct;104(10):871-6. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0856-x. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
9
The impact of risk score (CHADS2 versus CHA2DS2-VASc) on long-term outcomes after atrial fibrillation ablation.风险评分(CHADS2与CHA2DS2-VASc)对心房颤动消融术后长期预后的影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Apr;12(4):681-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
10
Five-year outcome of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation using termination of atrial fibrillation as a procedural endpoint.以房颤终止作为终点的导管消融持续性房颤的 5 年结果。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;8(1):18-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001943. Epub 2014 Dec 20.