Suppr超能文献

使用罗布森分类系统对孟买一家三级护理医院剖宫产分娩情况的研究

Study of Caesarean Section Births in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Mumbai Using Robson Classification System.

作者信息

Rajput Hitendrasing, Changede Pradnya, Chavan Niranjan, Nayak Arun, Mirza Hera, Mahapatra Shalini

机构信息

Department of OBGY, LTMMC, Mumbai, Maharashtra India.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Dec;73(6):496-503. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01851-y. Epub 2023 Oct 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Robson ten-group classification system is recommended by WHO (World health organization) as a global standard for assessment and monitoring caesarean section (CS) rates. This classification is simple and robust. It is prospective, easily reproducible and clinically relevant.

METHODOLOGY

We conducted a prospective observational study of CS births at a tertiary care institute. Caesarean births in a tertiary care hospital were classified using Robson classification system as recommended by WHO. The study was conducted for period of 6 months duration. The ethics committee of the institute approved this study. We enrolled 4771 consecutive women who delivered during this study period. We included patients who had vaginal delivery as well as those who had delivery by CS. Both live births and stillbirths (of at least 500-g birth weight or at least 22 weeks gestation (according to WHO recommendations) were included in this study.

RESULTS

During this study period, we had 4771 deliveries, out of which 2231 pregnant women (46.76%) were delivered by CS as compared to 2540 vaginal deliveries. Women with previous CS (term with single cephalic pregnancy) were included in Robson group 5. Group 5 had the highest CS rate (13.41%). Robson group 5, 1 and 10 were the largest contributors to the high CS rates at our institute.

CONCLUSION

In our study, 4771 deliveries were conducted during this study period (6 months). Out of 4771 deliveries, CS was done in 2231 pregnant women (46.76%). 2540 women had vaginal deliveries. Group 5 (13.41%) which comprised of women with previous CS had the highest CS rate followed by group 1 and group 10. The second largest contribution was from Group 1 with CS rate of 9.01%. Robson Group 1 included nulliparous term women with single cephalic pregnancy in spontaneous labour. Group 10 was the third largest contributor to the overall CS. Group 10 included women who delivered preterm (single cephalic presentation). Group 10 contributed to 8.09% of overall CS rate. We should make every effort to provide CS for women requiring this procedure, rather than work towards achieving a specific rate for CS.

摘要

引言

罗布森十组分类系统被世界卫生组织(WHO)推荐为评估和监测剖宫产(CS)率的全球标准。该分类简单且可靠。它具有前瞻性,易于重复且与临床相关。

方法

我们在一家三级医疗机构对剖宫产分娩进行了前瞻性观察研究。按照WHO的建议,使用罗布森分类系统对一家三级护理医院的剖宫产分娩进行分类。该研究持续了6个月。该机构的伦理委员会批准了这项研究。我们纳入了在本研究期间连续分娩的4771名妇女。我们纳入了经阴道分娩的患者以及剖宫产分娩的患者。本研究包括活产和死产(出生体重至少500克或妊娠至少22周(根据WHO建议))。

结果

在本研究期间,我们共进行了4771例分娩,其中2231名孕妇(46.76%)通过剖宫产分娩,而经阴道分娩的有2540例。既往有剖宫产史(足月单头位妊娠)的妇女被纳入罗布森第5组。第5组的剖宫产率最高(13.41%)。罗布森第5组、第1组和第10组是我院剖宫产率高的最大贡献组。

结论

在我们的研究中,本研究期间(6个月)共进行了4771例分娩。在4771例分娩中,2231名孕妇进行了剖宫产(46.76%)。2540名妇女经阴道分娩。由既往有剖宫产史的妇女组成的第5组(13.41%)剖宫产率最高,其次是第1组和第10组。第二大贡献来自第1组,剖宫产率为9.01%。罗布森第1组包括足月单头位妊娠自然分娩的初产妇。第10组是总体剖宫产第三大贡献组。第10组包括早产(单头位)分娩的妇女。第10组占总体剖宫产率的8.09%。我们应尽一切努力为需要剖宫产的妇女提供剖宫产服务,而不是致力于实现特定的剖宫产率。

相似文献

1
Study of Caesarean Section Births in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Mumbai Using Robson Classification System.
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Dec;73(6):496-503. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01851-y. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
2
Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jan;42(1):61-66. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1873923. Epub 2021 May 2.
4
A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jul;101(7):827-835. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14350. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
5
Investigating Caesarean Section Practice among Teenage Romanian Mothers Using Modified Robson Ten Group Classification System.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 13;18(20):10727. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010727.
7
Analysis of the caesarean section rate using the 10-Group Robson classification at Benha University Hospital, Egypt.
Women Birth. 2020 Mar;33(2):e105-e110. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
9
An Analysis of the Mode of Delivery, Risk Factors, and Subgroups with High Caesarean Birth Rates Using Robson Classification System.
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Apr;28(4):667-678. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03783-5. Epub 2023 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Robson Caesarean Calc© App: A User-Friendly Tool for Healthcare Providers.
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025 Jun;75(3):264-269. doi: 10.1007/s13224-025-02137-1. Epub 2025 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

2
Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson's Ten Group Classification System.
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):567-571. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823.
3
Rising Cesarean Rates: Are Primary Sections Overused?
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019 Dec;69(6):483-489. doi: 10.1007/s13224-019-01246-y. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
4
VBAC: antenatal predictors of success.
Acta Biomed. 2019 Sep 6;90(3):300-309. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i3.7623.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验