Nantes University, Movement - Interactions - Performance, MIP, UR-4334, Nantes, France.
Department of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2024 Apr 1;136(4):786-798. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00536.2023. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
The distribution of activation among muscles from the same anatomical group can be affected by the mechanical constraints of the task, such as limb orientation. For example, the distribution of activation between the gastrocnemius medialis (GM) and lateralis (GL) muscles during submaximal plantarflexion depends on the orientation of the foot in the horizontal plane. The neural mechanisms behind these modulations are not known. The overall aim of this study was to determine whether the excitability of the two gastrocnemius muscles is differentially affected by changes in foot orientation. Nineteen males performed isometric plantarflexions with their foot internally (toes-in) or externally (toes-out) rotated. GM and GL motor unit discharge characteristics were estimated from high-density surface electromyography to estimate neural drive. GM and GL corticospinal excitability and intracortical activity were assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation through motor-evoked potentials. The efficacy of synaptic transmission between Ia-afferent fibers and α-motoneurons of the GM and GL was evaluated through the Hoffmann reflex. We observed a differential change in neural drive between GM (toes-out > toes-in) and GL (toes-out < toes-in). However, there was no foot orientation-related modulation in corticospinal excitability of the GM or GL, either at the cortical level or through modulation of the efficacy of Ia-α-motoneuron transmission. These results demonstrate that change in the motor pathway excitability is not the mechanism controlling the different distribution of neural drive between GM and GL with foot orientation. Horizontal foot orientation affects the distribution of neural drive between the gastrocnemii during plantarflexion. There is no foot orientation-related modulation in the corticospinal excitability of the gastrocnemii, either at the cortical level or through modulation of the efficacy of Ia-α-motoneuron transmission. Change in motor pathway excitability is not the mechanism controlling the different distribution of neural drive between gastrocnemius medialis and lateralis with foot orientation.
同一解剖肌群中的肌肉激活分布可能会受到任务的力学限制的影响,例如肢体的方向。例如,在进行亚最大程度的跖屈时,内侧(脚趾向内)或外侧(脚趾向外)旋转的足部会影响比目鱼肌(GM)和外侧(GL)肌肉之间的激活分布。这些调节背后的神经机制尚不清楚。本研究的总体目标是确定足部方向的变化是否会对两个比目鱼肌的兴奋性产生差异影响。19 名男性进行了等长跖屈,其足部向内(脚趾向内)或向外(脚趾向外)旋转。使用高密度表面肌电图估算 GM 和 GL 运动单位放电特性,以估算神经驱动。通过经颅磁刺激通过运动诱发电位评估 GM 和 GL 的皮质脊髓兴奋性和皮质内活动。通过 Hoffmann 反射评估 Ia 传入纤维和 GM 和 GL 的α运动神经元之间的突触传递效率。我们观察到 GM(脚趾向外>脚趾向内)和 GL(脚趾向外<脚趾向内)之间的神经驱动存在差异变化。但是,无论是在皮质水平还是通过调节 Ia-α运动神经元传递的效率,GM 或 GL 的皮质脊髓兴奋性都没有与足部方向相关的调制。这些结果表明,运动通路兴奋性的变化不是控制足部方向时 GM 和 GL 之间神经驱动不同分布的机制。足部方向会影响跖屈时比目鱼肌之间的神经驱动分布。无论是在皮质水平还是通过调节 Ia-α运动神经元传递的效率,GM 或 GL 的皮质脊髓兴奋性都没有与足部方向相关的调制。改变运动通路兴奋性不是控制足部方向时 GM 和 GL 之间神经驱动不同分布的机制。