Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
St. Joseph's Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Stockton, California.
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jan;25(1):9-16. doi: 10.5811/westjem.60508.
Identification of patients not meeting catheterization laboratory activation criteria by electrocardiogram (ECG) but who would benefit from early coronary intervention remains challenging in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether emergency physician (EP)-performed point-of-care transthoracic echocardiography (POC TTE) could help identify patients who required coronary intervention within this population.
This was a retrospective observational cohort study of adult patients who presented to two EDs between 2018-2020. Patients were included if they received a POC TTE and underwent diagnostic coronary angiography within 72 hours of ED presentation. We excluded patients meeting catheterization laboratory activation criteria on initial ED ECG. Ultrasound studies were independently reviewed for presence of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) by two blinded ultrasound fellowship-trained EPs. We then calculated test characteristics for coronary intervention.
Of the 221 patient encounters meeting inclusion criteria, 104 (47%) received coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) referral. Overall prevalence of RWMA on POC TTE was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29-42%). Presence of RWMA had 38% (95% CI 29-49%) sensitivity and 68% (95% CI 58-76%) specificity for coronary intervention/CABG referral. Presence of "new" RWMA (presence on EP-performed POC TTE and prior normal echocardiogram) had 43% (95% CI 10-82%) sensitivity and 93% (95% CI 66-100%) specificity for coronary intervention/CABG referral. The EP-performed POC TTE interpretation of RWMA had 57% (95% CI 47-67%) sensitivity and 96% (95% CI 87-100%) specificity for presence of RWMA on subsequent cardiology echocardiogram during the same admission.
Presence of RWMA on EP-performed POC TTE had limited sensitivity or specificity for coronary intervention or referral to CABG. The observed specificity appeared to trend higher in subjects with a prior echocardiogram demonstrating absence of RWMA, although a larger sample size will be required to confirm this finding. The EP-performed POC TTE RWMA had high specificity for presence of RWMA on subsequent cardiology echocardiogram. Further evaluation of the diagnostic performance of new RWMA on EP-performed POC TTE with a dedicated cohort is warranted.
通过心电图(ECG)识别不符合导管实验室激活标准但可能从早期冠状动脉介入中获益的患者,在急诊科(ED)仍然具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估急诊医师(EP)进行即时床旁经胸超声心动图(POC TTE)是否有助于识别该人群中需要冠状动脉介入的患者。
这是一项回顾性观察性队列研究,纳入了 2018 年至 2020 年期间在两家 ED 就诊的成年患者。如果患者接受了 POC TTE 并在 ED 就诊后 72 小时内行诊断性冠状动脉造影,则将其纳入研究。我们排除了初始 ED ECG 符合导管实验室激活标准的患者。两名接受过超声心动图 fellowship培训的超声医师独立对超声研究进行了区域壁运动异常(RWMA)的评估。然后,我们计算了冠状动脉介入的检测特征。
在符合纳入标准的 221 例患者中,104 例(47%)接受了冠状动脉介入或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)转诊。POC TTE 上 RWMA 的总体患病率为 35%(95%置信区间 [CI] 29-42%)。RWMA 的存在对冠状动脉介入/CABG 转诊的敏感性为 38%(95% CI 29-49%),特异性为 68%(95% CI 58-76%)。“新发”RWMA(EP 进行的 POC TTE 上存在且既往正常超声心动图)对冠状动脉介入/CABG 转诊的敏感性为 43%(95% CI 10-82%),特异性为 93%(95% CI 66-100%)。EP 进行的 POC TTE 对 RWMA 的解读对随后入院期间的心脏病学超声心动图上 RWMA 的存在具有 57%(95% CI 47-67%)的敏感性和 96%(95% CI 87-100%)的特异性。
EP 进行的 POC TTE 上 RWMA 的存在对冠状动脉介入或 CABG 转诊的敏感性或特异性有限。尽管需要更大的样本量来证实这一发现,但在先前的超声心动图显示无 RWMA 的患者中,观察到的特异性似乎呈上升趋势。EP 进行的 POC TTE RWMA 对随后心脏病学超声心动图上 RWMA 的存在具有很高的特异性。需要进一步评估 EP 进行的 POC TTE 中新 RWMA 的诊断性能,并使用专门的队列进行研究。