Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine.
Personal Disord. 2024 Jan;15(1):60-73. doi: 10.1037/per0000643.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a serious and understudied mental health condition associated with profound personal and public health consequences. Methodological differences in characterizing BPD may limit understanding the scope of the disorder's prevalence and effect. For example, using different diagnostic rules for BPD can affect apparent prevalence, comorbidity, and clinical presentation. This study examined how differences in diagnostic rules used to assign BPD diagnosis impacted its prevalence and associations with clinically relevant variables (e.g., demographics, comorbidity, treatment-seeking). Participants were a nationally representative sample of 36,309 noninstitutionalized U.S. adults. All variables were assessed via clinical interview (Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-5). Six diagnostic rules determined BPD status. We used frequencies to examine prevalence rates of and associations between BPD and other clinical variables, and logistic regressions to examine the associations between each BPD variable and the other outcomes. The prevalence of BPD ranged widely-from 0.5% to 11.4%-per the diagnostic rule used. Associations between BPD diagnosis and various outcomes and clinical variables generally remained stable across all diagnostic rules, though effects became more extreme as diagnostic rules became more restrictive. Additionally, meaningful differences emerged as a function of the number of items used (30 vs. 18 items) even with no other changes to diagnostic rules. The field examining BPD and associated problem behaviors should critically consider how to most effectively characterize BPD to understand these problems more accurately and optimize the generalizability of findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是一种严重且研究不足的心理健康状况,与深刻的个人和公共健康后果相关。在描述 BPD 时,方法学上的差异可能会限制对该障碍流行程度和影响的理解。例如,使用不同的 BPD 诊断规则会影响明显的患病率、共病和临床表现。本研究探讨了用于诊断 BPD 的诊断规则的差异如何影响其患病率及其与临床相关变量(例如人口统计学、共病、寻求治疗)的关联。参与者是一个具有全国代表性的 36309 名非住院美国成年人样本。所有变量均通过临床访谈(酒精使用障碍及相关障碍访谈表-5)进行评估。六种诊断规则确定了 BPD 状况。我们使用频率来检查 BPD 和其他临床变量之间的患病率和关联,以及逻辑回归来检查每个 BPD 变量与其他结果之间的关联。根据使用的诊断规则,BPD 的患病率范围很广,从 0.5%到 11.4%不等。BPD 诊断与各种结果和临床变量之间的关联在所有诊断规则中基本保持稳定,尽管随着诊断规则变得更加严格,影响变得更加极端。此外,即使诊断规则没有其他变化,作为使用的项目数量(30 项与 18 项)的函数,也会出现有意义的差异。研究 BPD 和相关问题行为的领域应认真考虑如何最有效地描述 BPD,以更准确地了解这些问题,并优化研究结果的普遍性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。