Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anesthesiology. 2024 Apr 1;140(4):701-714. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004900.
Understanding factors that explain why some women experience greater postoperative pain and consume more opioids after cesarean delivery is crucial to building an evidence base for personalized prevention. Comprehensive psychosocial assessment with validated questionnaires in the preoperative period can be time-consuming. A three-item questionnaire has shown promise as a simpler tool to be integrated into clinical practice, but its brevity may limit the ability to explain heterogeneity in psychosocial pain modulators among individuals. This study compared the explanatory ability of three models: (1) the 3-item questionnaire, (2) a 58-item questionnaire (long) including validated questionnaires (e.g., Brief Pain Inventory, Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System [PROMIS]) plus the 3-item questionnaire, and (3) a novel 19-item questionnaire (brief) assessing several psychosocial factors plus the 3-item questionnaire. Additionally, this study explored the utility of adding a pragmatic quantitative sensory test to models.
In this prospective, observational study, 545 women undergoing cesarean delivery completed questionnaires presurgery. Pain during local anesthetic skin wheal before spinal placement served as a pragmatic quantitative sensory test. Postoperatively, pain and opioid consumption were assessed. Linear regression analysis assessed model fit and the association of model items with pain and opioid consumption during the 48 h after surgery.
A modest amount of variability was explained by each of the three models for postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Both the brief and long questionnaire models performed better than the three-item questionnaire but were themselves statistically indistinguishable. Items that were independently associated with pain and opioid consumption included anticipated postsurgical pain medication requirement, surgical anxiety, poor sleep, pre-existing pain, and catastrophic thinking about pain. The quantitative sensory test was itself independently associated with pain across models but only modestly improved models for postoperative pain.
The brief questionnaire may be more clinically feasible than longer validated questionnaires, while still performing better and integrating a more comprehensive psychosocial assessment than the three-item questionnaire.
了解为什么一些女性在剖宫产术后经历更剧烈的疼痛和消耗更多阿片类药物的原因,对于建立个性化预防的证据基础至关重要。在术前使用经过验证的问卷进行全面的社会心理评估可能会很耗时。一个由三个项目组成的问卷已经显示出作为一种更简单的工具整合到临床实践中的潜力,但它的简洁性可能会限制其在个体中解释社会心理疼痛调节剂异质性的能力。本研究比较了三个模型的解释能力:(1)三项目问卷,(2)包括经过验证的问卷(如简明疼痛量表、患者报告结局测量信息系统[PROMIS])和三项目问卷的 58 项目问卷(长),以及(3)评估几个社会心理因素和三项目问卷的新 19 项目问卷(短)。此外,本研究还探讨了在模型中添加实用的定量感觉测试的效用。
在这项前瞻性、观察性研究中,545 名接受剖宫产的女性在术前完成了问卷。在脊髓放置前进行局部麻醉皮肤划痕时的疼痛作为一种实用的定量感觉测试。术后评估疼痛和阿片类药物的消耗。线性回归分析评估了模型的拟合度以及模型项目与术后 48 小时内疼痛和阿片类药物消耗的相关性。
三个模型对术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗的解释都有一定程度的差异。简短和长问卷模型都比三项目问卷表现更好,但统计学上无显著差异。与疼痛和阿片类药物消耗独立相关的项目包括预期术后止痛药需求、手术焦虑、睡眠不佳、预先存在的疼痛和对疼痛的灾难性思维。定量感觉测试本身与模型中的疼痛独立相关,但仅适度改善了术后疼痛模型。
简短问卷可能比更长的验证问卷更具临床可行性,同时仍能表现更好,并整合更全面的社会心理评估,优于三项目问卷。