Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Comprehensive Dentistry and Clinical Education, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan.
J Prosthodont Res. 2024 Jul 8;68(3):368-379. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00151. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
This narrative review aimed to survey the clinical outcomes of laminate veneers (LVs), including their survival and success rates.
An electronic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from 2000 to April 2023 was conducted using the keywords "laminate" OR "veneer" OR "porcelain" OR "feldspathic" OR "lithium disilicate" OR "composite resin" OR "zirconia" OR "survival" OR "success." Case reports, case series, reviews, abstracts, in vitro studies, and observational studies were excluded. Five researchers independently evaluated the titles and abstracts of all identified studies.
A total of 55 studies were identified. None of the studies met the criteria for zirconia LVs. According to the studies in this review, LVs fabricated with feldspathic porcelain, leucite-reinforced glass ceramics (LRG), and lithium disilicate ceramics (LDS) exhibited satisfactory survival and success rates. Furthermore, hydrofluoric acid etching followed by silane priming of the surface of ceramic LVs is necessary for improved clinical outcomes. The extent of dentin exposure significantly decreases the success rate of ceramic LVs. An appropriate adhesive luting process is required to achieve the long-term success of ceramic LVs. Dentin exposure should be minimized or sealed during tooth preparation to achieve a reliable and durable bond between LVs and abutment teeth.
Based on this narrative review of the literature, the use of silica-based ceramic feldspathic porcelain, LRG, and LDS is recommended for LVs.
本叙述性综述旨在调查层压贴面（LV）的临床效果，包括其存活率和成功率。
从 2000 年至 2023 年 4 月，通过使用关键词“层压”或“贴面”或“瓷”或“长石质”或“锂硅二酸盐”或“复合树脂”或“氧化锆”或“存活率”或“成功率”，对 MEDLINE/PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆和 Google Scholar 进行了电子检索。排除病例报告、病例系列、综述、摘要、体外研究和观察性研究。五名研究人员独立评估了所有确定研究的标题和摘要。
共确定了 55 项研究。没有一项研究符合氧化锆 LV 的标准。根据本综述中的研究，用长石质瓷、锂增强玻璃陶瓷（LRG）和锂硅二酸盐陶瓷（LDS）制成的 LV 表现出令人满意的存活率和成功率。此外，需要对陶瓷 LV 表面进行氢氟酸蚀刻，然后进行硅烷预处理，以获得更好的临床效果。牙本质暴露的程度显著降低了陶瓷 LV 的成功率。需要适当的粘合固化过程，以实现陶瓷 LV 的长期成功。在牙齿预备过程中应尽量减少或密封牙本质暴露，以实现 LV 和基牙之间可靠且持久的结合。
基于对文献的叙述性综述，建议使用硅基陶瓷长石质瓷、LRG 和 LDS 来制作 LV。
