Department of Invertebrate Evolution; Faculty of Biology; Jagiellonian University; Gronostajowa 9; 30-387 Krakw; Poland; Natural History Museum of Denmark; University of Copenhagen; ster Voldgade 5-7; DK-1350; Universitetsparken 15; DK-2100; Copenhagen; Denmark.
Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt; Senckenberganlage 25; 60325 Frankfurt am Main; Germany.
Zootaxa. 2023 Sep 14;5344(1):1-72. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.5344.1.1.
Traditionally Eurocentric tardigrade taxonomy has started to dissect endemics from very few truly cosmopolitan or widely distributed species, originally described mostly from the West Palaearctic, in the last decade. Obviously, the most problematic for taxonomic identification are species in large genera containing over 100 species in the case of Tardigrada. In limno-terrestrial heterotardigrades, only Echiniscus C.A.S. Schultze, 1840 fulfils this criterion, being a perfect example of taxonomic inflation. In Echiniscidae, this phenomenon results predominantly from the historical fallacy of attaching more importance to chaetotaxy than to the analysis of dorsal plate sculpturing. In this paper, the first of a series on echiniscids of the World, we review the current state of knowledge on the West Palaearctic Echiniscus species. Echiniscus granulatus (Doyre, 1840) and E. spinulosus (Doyre, 1840) are re-described based on multiple population data. Echiniscus lapponicus Thulin, 1911 and E. militaris Murray, 1911 are provided with the first SEM and molecular data, respectively. Following synonymies are made based on analyses of ample comparative material, type series, and redescriptions: E. blumi schizofilus Barto, 1941 syn. nov. and E. trojanus Maucci, 1973 syn. nov. of E. blumi blumi Richters, 1903; E. inocelatus Miheli, 1938 syn. nov., E. heterospinosus Maucci, 1954 syn. nov. and E. egnatiae Durante Pasa & Maucci, 1979 syn. nov. of E. granulatus; Echiniscus merokensis suecicus Thulin, 1911 syn. nov., E. columinis Murray, 1911 syn. nov., E. batramiae Iharos, 1936 syn. nov., E. jagodici Miheli, 1951 syn. nov. and E. laterospinosus Rudescu, 1964 syn. nov. of E. merokensis merokensis Richters, 1904; E. hexacanthus Maucci, 1973 syn. nov. of E. militaris Murray, 1911; E. carusoi Pilato, 1972 syn. nov. of E. spinulosus; E. osellai Maucci, 1974 syn. nov. of E. trisetosus Cunot, 1932. Two new nomina dubia are proposed: E. apuanus M. Bertolani, 1946 sp. dub. (and a probable synonymy with E. merokensis suggested) and E. pajstunensis Barto, 1941 sp. dub. Two new nomina inquirenda are established: E. marleyi Li, 2007 sp. inq. (another chaetotaxy-based morphotype of the Echiniscus blumi-canadensis complex) and E. punctus McInnes, 1995 sp. inq. (the lack of reliable morphological criteria separating it from E. granulatus). We summarise the morphological, phylogenetic and biogeographic information for the West Palaearctic Echiniscus species, and conclude with a total of 21 valid and identifiable taxa. We predict this number will decrease further with solving the species delimitation issues within the Echiniscus blumi-canadensis complex. Among these 21 taxa, 13 species (62%) are to be found solely in the Western Palaearctic and/or entire Holarctic regions. This augments the many recent findings that tardigrades are typically biogeographically structured and form clearly defined faunae.
传统的以欧洲为中心的缓步动物 taxonomy 开始从极少数真正的世界性或广泛分布的物种中进行剖析,这些物种最初主要是从西古北区描述的,这是在过去十年中发生的。显然,对于分类鉴定来说,最成问题的是在大型属中含有 100 多种物种的物种,就缓步动物而言。在 Limno-terrestrial heterotardigrades 中,只有 Echiniscus C.A.S. Schultze, 1840 符合这一标准,是分类膨胀的完美例子。在 Echiniscidae 中,这种现象主要是由于历史上错误地认为附肢的形态比背甲雕刻的分析更重要。在本文中,这是关于世界上 Echiniscidae 的一系列论文中的第一篇,我们回顾了西古北区 Echiniscus 物种的现有知识状态。Echiniscus granulatus (Doyre, 1840) 和 E. spinulosus (Doyre, 1840) 根据多个种群数据进行了重新描述。Echiniscus lapponicus Thulin, 1911 和 E. militaris Murray, 1911 分别提供了第一次 SEM 和分子数据。根据对大量比较材料、模式系列和重新描述的分析,做出了以下同义词:E. blumi schizofilus Barto, 1941 syn. nov. 和 E. trojanus Maucci, 1973 syn. nov. of E. blumi blumi Richters, 1903;E. inocelatus Miheli, 1938 syn. nov.,E. heterospinosus Maucci, 1954 syn. nov. 和 E. egnatiae Durante Pasa & Maucci, 1979 syn. nov. of E. granulatus;Echiniscus merokensis suecicus Thulin, 1911 syn. nov.,E. columinis Murray, 1911 syn. nov.,E. batramiae Iharos, 1936 syn. nov.,E. jagodici Miheli, 1951 syn. nov. 和 E. laterospinosus Rudescu, 1964 syn. nov. of E. merokensis merokensis Richters, 1904;E. hexacanthus Maucci, 1973 syn. nov. of E. militaris Murray, 1911;E. carusoi Pilato, 1972 syn. nov. of E. spinulosus;E. osellai Maucci, 1974 syn. nov. of E. trisetosus Cunot, 1932。提出了两个新的可疑名称:E. apuanus M. Bertolani, 1946 sp. dub.(并建议与 E. merokensis 可能存在同义关系)和 E. pajstunensis Barto, 1941 sp. dub. 建立了两个新的可疑名称:E. marleyi Li, 2007 sp. inq.(Echiniscus blumi-canadensis 复合体的另一个基于附肢形态的形态型)和 E. punctus McInnes, 1995 sp. inq.(缺乏可靠的形态学标准将其与 E. granulatus 区分开来)。我们总结了西古北区 Echiniscus 物种的形态、系统发育和生物地理信息,并以 21 个有效和可识别的分类单元作为结论。我们预测,随着解决 Echiniscus blumi-canadensis 复合体中的物种划界问题,这个数字还会进一步减少。在这 21 个分类单元中,有 13 个物种(62%)仅存在于西古北区和/或整个全北区。这增加了许多最近的发现,即缓步动物通常具有生物地理结构,并形成了明确的动物群。