Javid Mohamed, Abdullah Atif, Ganapathy Ramesh, Gupta Yogendra Basoo, Selvaraj Sudhakaran, Ilangovan Ananda Kumar, Sivalingam Senthilkumar, Prasad Srikala
Urology, Chengalpattu Medical College, Chengalpattu, IND.
Urology, AR Hospital, Ramanathapuram, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Dec 14;15(12):e50502. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50502. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Introduction Alpha-adrenergic blockers like tamsulosin are widely used in the treatment of stent-related symptoms due to ureteric stents. Recently, mirabegron has emerged as a potential alternative. So, our study aimed to compare the effect of mirabegron and tamsulosin on ureteric stent-related morbidity. Methods In this randomized controlled study, 80 patients undergoing uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy with double J stenting for ureteric stones were enrolled. They were divided into two groups: Group A (n=40) received mirabegron (25mg) and Group B (n=40) received tamsulosin (0.4mg). Outcomes were assessed using the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ), International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), and the visual analog pain scale. The t-test and the Chi-square test were utilized to study the efficacy of the interventions across both groups. Results The USSQ urinary symptom score (25.5 vs 33.45; p < 0.001) and body pain score (16.15 vs 26.02; P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the mirabegron group. However, the general health score (17.0 vs 17.28; p = 0.62) and work performance score (7.6 vs 8.0; p = 0.28) did not show a significant difference. The storage symptom score was significantly lower in the mirabegron group (3.98 vs 5.1; p = 0.001). Furthermore, the mirabegron group reported a better quality of life score (2.18 vs 3; p < 0.001). Conclusion Mirabegron has been shown to reduce urinary symptoms associated with ureteric stents and also results in a better quality of life when compared with tamsulosin. However, large-scale, prospective, multicentric studies are further required to holistically evaluate and comprehend the beneficial effects of mirabegron on stent-related morbidity.
像坦索罗辛这样的α-肾上腺素能阻滞剂被广泛用于治疗输尿管支架相关症状。最近,米拉贝隆已成为一种潜在的替代药物。因此,我们的研究旨在比较米拉贝隆和坦索罗辛对输尿管支架相关发病率的影响。
在这项随机对照研究中,纳入了80例因输尿管结石接受无并发症输尿管镜碎石术并置入双J支架的患者。他们被分为两组:A组(n = 40)接受米拉贝隆(25mg),B组(n = 40)接受坦索罗辛(0.4mg)。使用输尿管支架症状问卷(USSQ)、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)和视觉模拟疼痛量表评估结果。采用t检验和卡方检验研究两组干预措施的疗效。
米拉贝隆组的USSQ尿路症状评分(25.5对33.45;p < 0.001)和身体疼痛评分(16.15对26.02;P < 0.001)显著更低。然而,总体健康评分(17.0对17.28;p = 0.62)和工作表现评分(7.6对8.0;p = 0.28)没有显著差异。米拉贝隆组的储尿症状评分显著更低(3.98对5.1;p = 0.001)。此外,米拉贝隆组报告的生活质量评分更好(2.18对3;p < 0.001)。
与坦索罗辛相比,米拉贝隆已被证明可减轻与输尿管支架相关的尿路症状,并带来更好的生活质量。然而,还需要大规模、前瞻性、多中心研究来全面评估和理解米拉贝隆对支架相关发病率的有益影响。