Karpen Riley, Murphy Claire, Reed Erica, Gerlach Anthony T, Cape Kari, Mellett John, Atyia Sara A
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center East Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Hosp Pharm. 2024 Feb;59(1):32-38. doi: 10.1177/00185787231182567. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
The implementation of an automated, pharmacist-driven, scoring system within the EMR has been shown to improve patient care in patients with bacteremia by increasing the adherence to disease specific quality-of-care measures. However, there are a lack of studies evaluating the incorporation of blood culture review into standard, non-antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist workflow. Our institution implemented an automated, pharmacist-driven, antimicrobial scoring system in the electronic medical record (EMR) on August 6, 2019. This was a retrospective, single-center, quasi-experimental study of hospitalized, non-critically ill adult (18-89 years of age) patients with bacteremia between July 6, 2018 and July 5, 2019 (pre-implementation group) and September 6, 2019 and September 5, 2020 (post-implementation group). The primary outcome was time to directed antibiotic therapy in patients with positive blood cultures. Secondary outcomes included hospital length-of-stay, days of therapy (DOT) while inpatient, time to effective therapy, 30-day all-cause mortality, and rates of infections documented within 3 months of positive culture results. Implementation of the antimicrobial scoring system did not result in a significant change in time to directed antibiotic therapy (32.5 hours vs 37.4 hours; = .757). There was also no difference found for time to effective antibiotic therapy (-12.6 hours vs -14.2 hours; =.905) and no difference found for all other secondary outcomes. The implementation of the antimicrobial scoring system did not lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to better define a patient population that may benefit from this system.
在电子病历(EMR)中实施由药剂师驱动的自动化评分系统,已被证明可通过提高对特定疾病护理质量措施的依从性,改善菌血症患者的治疗效果。然而,缺乏关于将血培养结果审查纳入标准的、非抗菌药物管理药剂师工作流程的研究。我们机构于2019年8月6日在电子病历(EMR)中实施了由药剂师驱动的自动化抗菌评分系统。这是一项回顾性、单中心、准实验性研究,研究对象为2018年7月6日至2019年7月5日(实施前组)以及2019年9月6日至2020年9月5日(实施后组)期间住院的非危重症成年(18 - 89岁)菌血症患者。主要结局指标是血培养阳性患者接受针对性抗生素治疗的时间。次要结局指标包括住院时间、住院期间的治疗天数(DOT)、有效治疗时间、30天全因死亡率以及阳性培养结果后3个月内记录到的感染率。抗菌评分系统的实施并未导致针对性抗生素治疗时间出现显著变化(32.5小时对37.4小时;P = 0.757)。有效抗生素治疗时间也未发现差异(-12.6小时对-14.2小时;P = 0.905),其他所有次要结局指标也未发现差异。抗菌评分系统的实施并未使临床结局得到改善。需要进一步研究以更好地确定可能从该系统中获益的患者群体。