Department of Plant Science, University of California, Davis, 95616, CA, USA.
Black Sea Agricultural Research Institute, Samsun, Türkiye.
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2024 Jan;198:105746. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2023.105746. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
For more than two decades, weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) has been controlled in rice fields by using imidazolinone (IMI) herbicide-resistant rice technology (Clearfield®). Outcrossing in weedy rice populations and spontaneous mutations are potential problems with herbicide-resistant crop management technologies, such as the IMI-resistant rice. The aim of this study was to characterize the mechanism of IMI herbicide resistance in weedy rice through dose-response bioassay study and evaluating amino acid substitutions in acetolactate synthase (ALS) protein. A total of 118 suspected IMI-resistant weedy rice samples, which survived in the field after an IMI herbicide application, were collected at harvest time from Türkiye in 2020 and 2021. Single-dose imazamox application experiment revealed that 38 plants survived herbicide treatment. The imazamox resistance of the surviving plants was confirmed by dose-response experiment. ALS gene region underwent a sanger DNA partial sequencing. No substitution was found in 10 samples, however, amino acid substitutions were found in 26 samples with S563N, one sample with S653T, and one sample with E630D. The S653N point is the same substitution point that serves as the origin of resistance for the Clearfield® rice varieties that are commonly cultivated in the region. It has been hypothesized that the gene flow from IMI-resistant rice may be the cause of resistance in the IMI resistant weedy rice samples with S653N. The other substitution, S653T, were considered spontaneous mutation to IMI resistance. Interestingly, the S653T mutation was detected for the first time in weedy rice. The mechanism of resistance of 10 resistant weedy rice was not confirmed in this study, however, it may be a non-target resistance or another mutation point in target site, but evidently, they did not acquire resistance by gene flow from IMI-resistant rice. It has been concluded that the effectiveness of IMI-resistant rice technology in controlling weedy rice has drastically decreased due to possible gene flow, spontaneous mutation and non-target resistance. In addition to cultural controls like clean seed, clean machinery and crop rotation, other herbicide-tolerant rice systems such as Provisia® and Roxy-RPS® rice are needed to create a diverse weedy rice management ensemble available for rice production and move towards sustainable rice farming.
二十多年来,利用咪唑啉酮(IMI)除草剂抗性水稻技术(Clearfield®)在稻田中控制杂草稻。杂草稻种群中的异交和自发突变是除草剂抗性作物管理技术(如 IMI 抗性水稻)的潜在问题。本研究旨在通过剂量反应生物测定研究和评估乙酰乳酸合酶(ALS)蛋白中的氨基酸取代,来表征杂草稻中 IMI 除草剂抗性的机制。总共收集了 2020 年和 2021 年土耳其收获期在田间使用 IMI 除草剂后存活下来的 118 个疑似 IMI 抗性杂草稻样本。单剂量咪草烟应用实验表明,有 38 株植物在除草剂处理后存活下来。通过剂量反应实验证实了存活植物的咪草烟抗性。ALS 基因区域进行了桑格 DNA 部分测序。在 10 个样本中没有发现取代,然而,在 26 个样本中发现了 S563N、一个样本中发现了 S653T 和一个样本中发现了 E630D。S653N 点是该地区常见种植的 Clearfield®水稻品种抗性起源的相同取代点。据推测,来自 IMI 抗性水稻的基因流可能是具有 S653N 的 IMI 抗性杂草稻样本产生抗性的原因。另一个取代,S653T,被认为是对 IMI 抗性的自发突变。有趣的是,首次在杂草稻中检测到 S653T 突变。本研究未证实 10 株抗性杂草稻的抗性机制,但可能是靶标位点的非靶标抗性或另一个突变点,但显然它们没有通过来自 IMI 抗性水稻的基因流获得抗性。研究结论认为,由于可能的基因流、自发突变和非靶标抗性,IMI 抗性水稻技术控制杂草稻的效果已大幅下降。除了清洁种子、清洁机械和轮作等文化控制措施外,还需要其他耐除草剂水稻系统,如 Provisia®和 Roxy-RPS®水稻,以创建一个多样化的杂草稻管理组合,用于水稻生产,并朝着可持续的水稻农业发展。