School of Health, University of Sunshine Coast, Brisbane, Australia; and.
School of Health Sciences & Social Work, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Mar 1;38(3):584-591. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004665. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
Beaumont, P, Garrett, J, and van den Hoek, D. How do intracompetition strategies differ between para powerlifting podium and nonpodium athletes? A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. J Strength Cond Res 38(3): 584-591, 2024-This study aimed to investigate the intracompetition strategies used by para powerlifters and quantify and report them for application by coaches and athletes to improve their odds of competitive success. A cross-sectional retrospective analysis was conducted using a public powerlifting database. Primary analysis categorized athletes as either podium (POD) or nonpodium (NPOD), and a subanalysis classified athletes as either gold medalists (GMs) or silver and bronze medalists (SBMs). Analyses of variance were used to assess the significance of the difference between groups. Pearson's correlations were used to evaluate the magnitude of the relationships and binary logistic regressions were used to quantify the variables. Results are reported as odds ratios, and an alpha level of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There was a significant difference in mean age (POD = 1.6 years younger; p < 0.001), body mass (POD = 2.7 kg heavier; p = 0.006), and best lift (POD = 19.5 kg greater; p < 0.001) for female POD athletes compared with NPOD athletes. For male POD athletes compared with NPOD athletes, there was a difference in mean age (POD = 0.6 years younger; p = 0.035) and best lift (POD = 28.4 kg greater; p < 0.001). Comparing GMs with SBMs showed a significant difference in the mean best lift in both men (GM = 17.4 kg greater; p < 0.001) and women (GM = 11.1 kg greater; p < 0.001). A positive relationship was seen in both the primary and subanalysis between the number of successful lifts (of 3) and an increase in the odds of competitive success (i.e., winning). The findings of this research indicate that high-performing para powerlifters tend to choose attempt weights that prioritize the successful completion of all 3 intracompetition lifts to win a competition.
博蒙特、加勒特和范登霍克。残疾举重运动员在比赛中如何使用不同的内部竞争策略？一项回顾性的、横截面分析。J 力量与条件研究 38(3)：584-591, 2024-本研究旨在调查残疾举重运动员使用的内部竞争策略，并对其进行量化和报告，以供教练和运动员应用，以提高他们的竞争成功几率。使用公共举重数据库进行了横截面回顾性分析。主要分析将运动员分为领奖台（POD）或非领奖台（NPOD）运动员，子分析将运动员分为金牌（GM）或银牌和铜牌（SBM）运动员。使用方差分析评估组间差异的显著性。使用皮尔逊相关评估关系的大小，使用二元逻辑回归量化变量。结果以优势比表示，p<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。女性 POD 运动员的平均年龄（POD 年轻 1.6 岁；p<0.001）、体重（POD 重 2.7 公斤；p=0.006）和最佳举重（POD 重 19.5 公斤；p<0.001）与 NPOD 运动员有显著差异。与 NPOD 运动员相比，男性 POD 运动员的平均年龄（POD 年轻 0.6 岁；p=0.035）和最佳举重（POD 重 28.4 公斤；p<0.001）也有差异。与 SBM 相比，GM 在男性（GM 重 17.4 公斤；p<0.001）和女性（GM 重 11.1 公斤；p<0.001）的最佳举重上有显著差异。在主要分析和子分析中，成功举重次数（3 次）与竞争成功几率（即获胜）之间都存在正相关关系。本研究的结果表明，表现出色的残疾举重运动员倾向于选择尝试重量，以优先完成所有 3 次内部竞争举重，以赢得比赛。
