Lv Guanhua, Wang Hengpeng, Wei Xiaoou, Lu Minmin, Yang Wenhao, Aalim Halah, Capanoglu Esra, Zou Xiaobo, Battino Maurizio, Zhang Di
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Key Laboratory of Chinese Cuisine Intangible Cultural Heritage Technology Inheritance, Ministry of Culture and Tourism, College of Tourism and Culinary Science, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China.
Foods. 2023 Nov 29;12(23):4322. doi: 10.3390/foods12234322.
Meat digestion and intestinal flora fermentation characteristics are closely related to human dietary health. The present study investigated the effect of different cooking treatments, including boiling, roasting, microwaving, stir-frying, and deep-frying, on the oxidation of chicken protein as well as its structural and digestion characteristics. The results revealed that deep-fried and roasted chicken exhibited a relatively higher degree of protein oxidation, while that of boiled chicken was the lowest ( < 0.05). Both stir-frying and deep-frying led to a greater conversion of the α-helix structure of chicken protein into a β-sheet structure and resulted in lower protein gastrointestinal digestibility ( < 0.05), whereas roasted chicken exhibited moderate digestibility. Further, the impact of residual undigested chicken protein on the intestinal flora fermentation was assessed. During the fermentation process, roasted chicken generated the highest number of new intestinal flora species (49 species), exhibiting the highest Chao 1 index (356.20) and a relatively low Simpson index (0.88). Its relative abundance of was the highest (33.33%), while the total production of six short-chain fatty acids was the lowest (50.76 mM). Although stir-fried and deep-fried chicken exhibited lower digestibility, their adverse impact on intestinal flora was not greater than that of roasted chicken. Therefore, roasting is the least recommended method for the daily cooking of chicken. The present work provides practical advice for choosing cooking methods for chicken in daily life, which is useful for human dietary health.
肉类消化和肠道菌群发酵特性与人类饮食健康密切相关。本研究调查了不同烹饪处理方法,包括煮、烤、微波加热、炒和炸,对鸡肉蛋白质氧化及其结构和消化特性的影响。结果显示,炸鸡和烤鸡的蛋白质氧化程度相对较高,而煮鸡的蛋白质氧化程度最低(<0.05)。炒和炸都会使鸡肉蛋白质的α-螺旋结构更多地转化为β-折叠结构,并导致蛋白质的胃肠道消化率降低(<0.05),而烤鸡的消化率适中。此外,还评估了残留未消化鸡肉蛋白质对肠道菌群发酵的影响。在发酵过程中,烤鸡产生的新肠道菌群种类最多(49种),Chao 1指数最高(356.20),辛普森指数相对较低(0.88)。其相对丰度最高(33.33%),而六种短链脂肪酸的总产量最低(50.76 mM)。虽然炒鸡和炸鸡的消化率较低,但它们对肠道菌群的不利影响并不比烤鸡更大。因此,烤是日常烹饪鸡肉最不推荐的方法。本研究为日常生活中鸡肉烹饪方法的选择提供了实用建议,对人类饮食健康有益。