Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚肿瘤医生调查:III 期肺癌患者中度伐利尤单抗的应用模式存在差异。

Variations in Patterns of Prescribing Durvalumab in Stage III Lung Cancer: A Survey of Australian Medical Oncologists.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.

Department of Medical Oncology, Nepean Hospital, Nepean, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Oncology. 2024;102(8):732-736. doi: 10.1159/000535855. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Local Australian guidelines for the optimal management of stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are lacking. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines recommend consolidation durvalumab for all patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, irrespective of their PD-L1 expression or driver mutation status. The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) differs, with consolidation durvalumab only recommended in those patients whose tumours express PD-L1.

METHODS

Due to differing global guidelines, we conducted an Australia and New Zealand wide survey of medical oncologists specialising in thoracic cancer to determine the variations in patterns of prescribing durvalumab in stage III unresectable NSCLC. This survey was done electronically and sponsored by the Thoracic Oncology Group of Australia (TOGA).

RESULTS

Thirty-two medical oncologists completed the survey. In patients with EGFR-mutated stage III unresectable NSCLC, 6% of respondents stated that they prescribed durvalumab for all patients, while an additional 6% strongly recommended treatment. Forty-four percent suggested little benefit of consolidation durvalumab in this cohort, with an additional 19% advocating for observation only. In patients with PD-L1 negative (0%) stage III unresectable NSCLC, 13% of respondents prescribed durvalumab for all patients, while an additional 56% strongly recommended treatment. Interestingly, 18%, 10%, and 10% of prescribers discussed self-funded oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with EGFR, ALK, or ROS-1-mutated NSCLC respectively as a substitute for consolidation durvalumab.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the clinical practice of Australian and New Zealand Medical Oncologists is variable, but remains consistent with either the ASCO or ESMO guidelines. Local practice guidelines are required to ensure consistency in prescribing patterns across Australia, as well as providing evidence for self-funded treatments outside standard of care.

摘要

简介

目前缺乏针对不可切除 III 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的澳大利亚当地最佳管理指南。美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)指南建议对所有不可切除 III 期 NSCLC 患者使用巩固性 durvalumab,无论其 PD-L1 表达或驱动基因突变状态如何。欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)则有所不同,仅建议那些肿瘤表达 PD-L1 的患者使用巩固性 durvalumab。

方法

由于全球指南不同,我们对专门从事胸部癌症的澳大利亚和新西兰的医学肿瘤学家进行了一项调查,以确定在不可切除 III 期 NSCLC 中使用 durvalumab 的处方模式的差异。这项调查是通过电子方式进行的,并由澳大利亚胸部肿瘤学组(TOGA)赞助。

结果

32 名医学肿瘤学家完成了这项调查。在 EGFR 突变型不可切除 III 期 NSCLC 患者中,6%的受访者表示他们为所有患者开具 durvalumab,而另有 6%强烈建议进行治疗。44%的受访者认为巩固性 durvalumab 在这一人群中获益不大,另有 19%的人主张仅进行观察。在 PD-L1 阴性(0%)的不可切除 III 期 NSCLC 患者中,13%的受访者为所有患者开具 durvalumab,而另有 56%强烈建议进行治疗。有趣的是,18%、10%和 10%的处方者分别讨论了在 EGFR、ALK 或 ROS-1 突变型 NSCLC 患者中使用自费口服酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗作为巩固性 durvalumab 的替代治疗。

结论

总体而言,澳大利亚和新西兰医学肿瘤学家的临床实践存在差异,但仍符合 ASCO 或 ESMO 指南。需要制定当地实践指南,以确保澳大利亚各地的处方模式一致,并为标准治疗之外的自费治疗提供证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验