Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, FK9 4LA, Stirling, UK.
Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, BCV8P 5C2, Victoria, Canada.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2024 Jan 17;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00590-7.
Drug checking services (DCS) provide harm reduction support and advice to individuals based on chemical analysis of submitted substances of concern. Whilst there are currently no DCS in Scotland, community-based services are being planned in three cities.
In this paper, we report qualitative findings based on interviews with 43 participants, focused on perceptions of DCS and their implementation. Participants were relevant professionals, those with experience of drug use, and family members of those with experience of drug use. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to inform data collection and analysis. We report findings under nine constructs/themes across the five CFIR domains.
Participants noted the importance of DCS being implemented in low-threshold, trusted services with a harm reduction ethos, and outlined a range of further service design considerations such as speed of testing, and information provided through the analysis process. In relation to the 'inner setting', a key finding related to the potential value of leveraging existing resources in order to expand both reach and effectiveness of drug trend communication. The approach of local and national police to DCS, and the attitudes of the public and local community, were described as important external factors which could influence the success (or otherwise) of implementation. Bringing together a range of stakeholders in dialogue and developing tailored communication strategies were seen as ways to build support for DCS. Overall, we found high levels of support and perceived need for DCS amongst all stakeholder groups.
Our findings present initial implementation considerations for Scotland which could be further explored as DCS are operationalised. Further, our focus on implementation contexts is relevant to research on DCS more generally, given the minimal consideration of such issues in the literature.
药物检测服务(DCS)根据提交的关注物质的化学分析,为个人提供减少伤害的支持和建议。虽然苏格兰目前没有 DCS,但正在三个城市规划基于社区的服务。
在本文中,我们根据对 43 名参与者的访谈报告了定性发现,重点是对 DCS 及其实施的看法。参与者包括相关专业人员、有吸毒经验的人员以及有吸毒经验人员的家属。采用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)来告知数据收集和分析。我们根据 CFIR 的五个领域中的九个结构/主题报告发现。
参与者注意到 DCS 在具有减少伤害理念的低门槛、值得信赖的服务中实施的重要性,并概述了一系列进一步的服务设计考虑因素,例如测试速度以及通过分析过程提供的信息。关于“内部环境”,一个关键发现涉及利用现有资源的潜在价值,以便扩大毒品趋势信息的覆盖面和有效性。地方和国家警察对 DCS 的态度以及公众和当地社区的态度被描述为可能影响实施成败的重要外部因素。将一系列利益相关者聚集在一起进行对话并制定定制的沟通策略被视为建立对 DCS 支持的方法。总的来说,我们发现所有利益相关者群体都对 DCS 表示高度支持和需求。
我们的研究结果为苏格兰的 DCS 实施提供了初步的实施考虑因素,这些因素可以在 DCS 运作时进一步探讨。此外,我们对实施背景的关注与 DCS 研究更为相关,因为文献中对这些问题的考虑很少。