Narula Neeraj, Wong Emily C L, Dulai Parambir S, Marshall John K, Jairath Vipul, Reinisch Walter
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 1;119(7):1355-1364. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002654. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
Differences in 1-year outcomes among early and delayed responders have been demonstrated with some therapies in ulcerative colitis. However, it is unclear whether similar differences exist in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) treated with biologic therapies.
This was a post hoc analysis of patient-level data from the SEAVUE clinical trial program. Ustekinumab-treated and adalimumab-treated patients with clinical response at week 8, defined as a reduction in Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of at least 100 points from baseline or CDAI score <150, were deemed early responders and their outcomes were compared with delayed responders (week 8 nonresponders who subsequently responded at week 16) and nonresponders (no response at week 8 or 16). The primary outcome assessed was clinical remission at week 56, defined as CDAI <150.
A total of 373 participants (187 treated with ustekinumab and 186 treated with adalimumab) were included in this analysis. The overall rate of delayed clinical response was low in the SEAVUE clinical trial program (13.1%). No differences were observed for week 56 clinical remission among early vs delayed responders to ustekinumab or adalimumab nor were there significant differences for secondary outcomes assessed. Delayed responders to ustekinumab and adalimumab had a significant decline in C-reactive protein by week 8 when compared with nonresponders.
Among patients with moderate-to-severe CD, early and delayed responders to adalimumab and ustekinumab have similar 1-year clinical outcomes. Biomarker decline can be observed through the initial 8 weeks of therapy in patients who will eventually be delayed responders, which may help differentiate from nonresponders.
在溃疡性结肠炎的一些治疗中,已经证明早期和延迟应答者在 1 年的结果上存在差异。然而,在接受生物治疗的克罗恩病(CD)患者中,是否存在类似的差异尚不清楚。
这是 SEAVUE 临床试验计划的患者水平数据的事后分析。在第 8 周达到临床应答的乌司奴单抗和阿达木单抗治疗患者,定义为从基线起克罗恩病活动指数(CDAI)评分至少降低 100 分或 CDAI 评分<150,被认为是早期应答者,其结果与延迟应答者(第 8 周无应答但随后在第 16 周应答的患者)和无应答者(第 8 周或第 16 周无应答)进行比较。主要结局评估是第 56 周的临床缓解,定义为 CDAI<150。
这项分析共纳入 373 名参与者(187 名接受乌司奴单抗治疗,186 名接受阿达木单抗治疗)。在 SEAVUE 临床试验计划中,延迟临床应答的总体发生率较低(13.1%)。乌司奴单抗或阿达木单抗的早期应答者与延迟应答者相比,第 56 周临床缓解率无差异,次要结局也无显著差异。与无应答者相比,乌司奴单抗和阿达木单抗的延迟应答者在第 8 周时 C 反应蛋白显著下降。
在中重度 CD 患者中,阿达木单抗和乌司奴单抗的早期和延迟应答者在 1 年的临床结局相似。在最终为延迟应答者的患者中,通过最初的 8 周治疗可以观察到生物标志物的下降,这可能有助于将其与无应答者区分开来。