School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia; Office of Nursing and Midwifery Services, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2015, Australia.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Mar;151:104690. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104690. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
Patient safety is threatened when early signs of clinical deterioration are missed or not acted upon. This research began as a clinical-academic partnership established around a shared concern of nursing physical assessment practices on general wards and delayed recognition of clinical deterioration. The outcome was the development of a complex intervention facilitated at the ward level for proactive nursing surveillance.
The evidence-based nursing core assessment (ENCORE) trial was a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial. We hypothesised that ward intervention would reduce the incidence of patient rescue events (medical emergency team activations) and serious adverse events. We randomised 29 general wards in a 1:2 allocation, across 5 Australian hospitals to intervention (n = 10) and usual care wards (n = 19). Skilled facilitation over 12 months enabled practitioner-led, ward-level practice change for proactive nursing surveillance. The primary outcome was the rate of medical emergency team activations and secondary outcomes were unplanned intensive care unit admissions, on-ward resuscitations, and unexpected deaths. Outcomes were prospectively collected for 6 months following the initial 6 months of implementation. Analysis was at the patient level using generalised linear mixed models to account for clustering by ward.
We analysed 29,385 patient admissions to intervention (n = 11,792) and control (n = 17,593) wards. Adjusted models for overall effects suggested the intervention increased the rate of medical emergency team activations (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.314; 95 % confidence interval 0.975, 1.773), although the confidence interval was compatible with a marginal decrease to a substantial increase in rate. Confidence intervals for secondary outcomes included a range of plausible effects from benefit to harm. However, considerable heterogeneity was observed in intervention effects by patient comorbidity. Among patients with few comorbid conditions in the intervention arm there was a lower medical emergency team activation rate and decreased odds of unexpected death. Among patients with multimorbidity in the intervention arm there were higher rates of medical emergency team activation and intensive care unit admissions.
Trial outcomes have refined our assumptions about the impact of the ENCORE intervention. The intervention appears to have protective effects for patients with low complexity where frontline teams can respond locally. It also appears to have redistributed medical emergency team activations and unplanned intensive care unit admissions, mobilising higher rates of rescue for patients with multimorbidity.
ACTRN12618001903279 (Date of registration: 22/11/2018; First participant recruited: 01/02/2019).
当临床恶化的早期迹象被忽视或未得到处理时,患者安全会受到威胁。这项研究始于围绕护理物理评估实践在普通病房和临床恶化的延迟识别的共同关注点而建立的临床学术合作。结果是在病房层面上为主动护理监测制定了一项复杂的干预措施。
基于证据的护理核心评估(ENCORE)试验是一项实用的聚类随机对照试验。我们假设病房干预将降低患者抢救事件(医疗急救小组激活)和严重不良事件的发生率。我们在澳大利亚的 5 家医院中,将 29 个普通病房按 1:2 的比例随机分为干预组(n=10)和常规护理组(n=19)。在 12 个月的时间里,进行了熟练的促进,以实现以从业者为导向的、以病房为基础的主动护理监测实践变革。主要结局是医疗急救小组激活的发生率,次要结局是计划外重症监护病房入院、病房复苏和意外死亡。在实施的最初 6 个月后,前瞻性地收集了 6 个月的结果。使用广义线性混合模型在患者水平上进行分析,以考虑病房的聚类。
我们分析了干预(n=11792)和对照(n=17593)病房的 29385 例患者入院情况。总体效果的调整模型表明,干预增加了医疗急救小组激活的发生率(调整后的发病率比为 1.314;95%置信区间为 0.975,1.773),尽管置信区间与发生率的轻微下降或大幅上升兼容。次要结局的置信区间包括从获益到危害的一系列可能的影响。然而,干预效果在患者合并症方面存在很大的异质性。在干预组中合并症较少的患者中,医疗急救小组的激活率较低,意外死亡的几率也较低。在干预组中合并症较多的患者中,医疗急救小组的激活率和重症监护病房的入院率较高。
试验结果细化了我们对 ENCORE 干预措施影响的假设。该干预措施似乎对基层团队能够做出局部反应的低复杂性患者具有保护作用。它似乎还重新分配了医疗急救小组的激活和计划外的重症监护病房入院,为合并症较多的患者调动了更高的抢救率。
ACTRN12618001903279(注册日期:2018 年 11 月 22 日;首位参与者招募日期:2019 年 2 月 1 日)。